A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 3 years ago
Jimmy’s proof:
Statement 1: In triangle ADC and BCD, AD = BC (opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent)
Statement 2: Angle ADC = Angle BCD (angles of a rectangle are 90°)
Statement 3: DC=DC (transitive property of equality)
Statement 4: Triangle ADC and BCD are congruent (by SAS postulate)
Statement 5: AC = BD (by CPCTC)
Which statement in Jimmy’s proof has an error?
anonymous
 3 years ago
Jimmy’s proof: Statement 1: In triangle ADC and BCD, AD = BC (opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent) Statement 2: Angle ADC = Angle BCD (angles of a rectangle are 90°) Statement 3: DC=DC (transitive property of equality) Statement 4: Triangle ADC and BCD are congruent (by SAS postulate) Statement 5: AC = BD (by CPCTC) Which statement in Jimmy’s proof has an error?

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yeah apparently there is no error !!

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yippee!!Cheers for Jimmy!!

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0no i think there can be a mistake in statement five ..... if you consider each statement independent of each other then in statement 5 the student have not mentioned the congruent triangle so may be it can be considered as incorrect ever though the relation is correct

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I guess.. there could be an error in statement 1 , where he says that "opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent)" but .. as far as i know, you never say they are 'congruent', you always say they are 'equal'! :/

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0if u consider each statement independent then statement 4 is also wrong as u cannot say 2 triangles are congruent without proof or reason.....

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0thats CPCTC may be incorrect ....

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0as far as i know its CPCT[Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles] NOT CPCTC

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0nah CPCTC is rite its [Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent]

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@Hashir : Naah, 'CPCTC' is absolutely correct.. because.. he already proved that the 2 triangles are equal by SAS postulate..

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i am saying that there may be a possibility .... if we consider each statement independent

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0CPCTC ('Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent') is nothing but another name/abbr. for CPCT ..

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Okay Conclusion:Jimmy is an overcautious idiot trying to find a mistake in an absolutely correct proof!!

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so 3 has a problem ... 3 is incorrect ... got it now

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0whats wrong in 3??DC=DC is not true?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0bro in transitive property we prove that if a=b and b=c then a=c .... not a=a !!!

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it doesnt make any sense

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@Hashir : I totally agree with you!!.. transitive property is > if a=b, and b=c .. a=c! :P

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0it can be correct if he says that DC=CD

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0but he didnt say that

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0oh!ok!i did not know that!!so yes Jimmy being overcautious helped him as @Hashir the detective finds the criminal eluding his 2 pardnas!
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.