Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

KateMarie123

  • 3 years ago

Jimmy’s proof: Statement 1: In triangle ADC and BCD, AD = BC (opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent) Statement 2: Angle ADC = Angle BCD (angles of a rectangle are 90°) Statement 3: DC=DC (transitive property of equality) Statement 4: Triangle ADC and BCD are congruent (by SAS postulate) Statement 5: AC = BD (by CPCTC) Which statement in Jimmy’s proof has an error?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. KateMarie123
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  2. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no error

  3. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yeah apparently there is no error !!

  4. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yippee!!Cheers for Jimmy!!

  5. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no i think there can be a mistake in statement five ..... if you consider each statement independent of each other then in statement 5 the student have not mentioned the congruent triangle so may be it can be considered as incorrect ever though the relation is correct

  6. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ever=even

  7. Aditi_Singh
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I guess.. there could be an error in statement 1 , where he says that "opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent)" but .. as far as i know, you never say they are 'congruent', you always say they are 'equal'! :/

  8. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if u consider each statement independent then statement 4 is also wrong as u cannot say 2 triangles are congruent without proof or reason.....

  9. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    thats CPCTC may be incorrect ....

  10. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    as far as i know its CPCT[Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles] NOT CPCTC

  11. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    nah CPCTC is rite its [Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent]

  12. Aditi_Singh
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Hashir : Naah, 'CPCTC' is absolutely correct.. because.. he already proved that the 2 triangles are equal by SAS postulate..

  13. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    i am saying that there may be a possibility .... if we consider each statement independent

  14. Aditi_Singh
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    CPCTC ('Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent') is nothing but another name/abbr. for CPCT ..

  15. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay Conclusion:Jimmy is an over-cautious idiot trying to find a mistake in an absolutely correct proof!!

  16. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so 3 has a problem ... 3 is incorrect ... got it now

  17. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    whats wrong in 3??DC=DC is not true?

  18. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    bro in transitive property we prove that if a=b and b=c then a=c .... not a=a !!!

  19. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it doesnt make any sense

  20. Aditi_Singh
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Hashir : I totally agree with you!!.. transitive property is --> if a=b, and b=c .. a=c! :P

  21. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it can be correct if he says that DC=CD

  22. Hashir
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    but he didnt say that

  23. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    oh!ok!i did not know that!!so yes Jimmy being over-cautious helped him as @Hashir the detective finds the criminal eluding his 2 pardnas!

  24. King
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ;D

  25. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy