Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

KateMarie123

Jimmy’s proof: Statement 1: In triangle ADC and BCD, AD = BC (opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent) Statement 2: Angle ADC = Angle BCD (angles of a rectangle are 90°) Statement 3: DC=DC (transitive property of equality) Statement 4: Triangle ADC and BCD are congruent (by SAS postulate) Statement 5: AC = BD (by CPCTC) Which statement in Jimmy’s proof has an error?

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. KateMarie123
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    • one year ago
    1 Attachment
  2. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no error

    • one year ago
  3. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yeah apparently there is no error !!

    • one year ago
  4. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yippee!!Cheers for Jimmy!!

    • one year ago
  5. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no i think there can be a mistake in statement five ..... if you consider each statement independent of each other then in statement 5 the student have not mentioned the congruent triangle so may be it can be considered as incorrect ever though the relation is correct

    • one year ago
  6. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ever=even

    • one year ago
  7. Aditi_Singh
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I guess.. there could be an error in statement 1 , where he says that "opposite sides of a rectangle are congruent)" but .. as far as i know, you never say they are 'congruent', you always say they are 'equal'! :/

    • one year ago
  8. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if u consider each statement independent then statement 4 is also wrong as u cannot say 2 triangles are congruent without proof or reason.....

    • one year ago
  9. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    thats CPCTC may be incorrect ....

    • one year ago
  10. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    as far as i know its CPCT[Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles] NOT CPCTC

    • one year ago
  11. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    nah CPCTC is rite its [Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent]

    • one year ago
  12. Aditi_Singh
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Hashir : Naah, 'CPCTC' is absolutely correct.. because.. he already proved that the 2 triangles are equal by SAS postulate..

    • one year ago
  13. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    i am saying that there may be a possibility .... if we consider each statement independent

    • one year ago
  14. Aditi_Singh
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    CPCTC ('Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent') is nothing but another name/abbr. for CPCT ..

    • one year ago
  15. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Okay Conclusion:Jimmy is an over-cautious idiot trying to find a mistake in an absolutely correct proof!!

    • one year ago
  16. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so 3 has a problem ... 3 is incorrect ... got it now

    • one year ago
  17. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    whats wrong in 3??DC=DC is not true?

    • one year ago
  18. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    bro in transitive property we prove that if a=b and b=c then a=c .... not a=a !!!

    • one year ago
  19. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it doesnt make any sense

    • one year ago
  20. Aditi_Singh
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Hashir : I totally agree with you!!.. transitive property is --> if a=b, and b=c .. a=c! :P

    • one year ago
  21. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it can be correct if he says that DC=CD

    • one year ago
  22. Hashir
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    but he didnt say that

    • one year ago
  23. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    oh!ok!i did not know that!!so yes Jimmy being over-cautious helped him as @Hashir the detective finds the criminal eluding his 2 pardnas!

    • one year ago
  24. King
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ;D

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.