It is important to understand here that points and lines are simply geometric realizations of abstract concepts. As mentioned earlier, a . is not a point, nor is a drawing of a line actually a line. A point takes up no space, so it can't be shown, and similarly a line can't be shown because it has no height. Even a plane can't be shown really, because it has no depth. So, when you're asking these questions, it is best to avoid relying too heavily on your geometric interpretation of the concepts. Instead, it is better to look at them using the tools of analysis.
TuringTest is referring to some relevant results of analysis, for example, the uncountability of the real line. Not only is the real line infinite in the number of points, it is uncountably infinite. This ends up implying that the number of points between 0 and 1 is actually the same as the number of points on the entire real line. So, to interpret this somewhat geometrically, you can zoom in as close as you would like to the real line and still be looking at the same number of points. Of course, this doesn't work like any real-world object.
Another relevant way of looking at the real line is through the lens of topology. We can talk about the real line as a metric space, and we define the metric abstractly. We simply define how distance works. One sees by learning some introductory topology that the real line is actually just one way to look at the set of real numbers, and there are many others. So, this is another way to look at the problem.