## julie001 3 years ago has anbody taken flvs geometry in here???

1. lgbasallote

i have taken geometry does that count?

2. cwrw238

flvs geometry?

3. julie001

yes i need help with a problem but no one seems to know how to do it

4. lgbasallote

why does it have to be specifically someone who has taken flvs geometry? after all according to the law of multiple proportions, flvs geometry is just the same as my and other people's geometry..

5. julie001

oh okay do u think u can help?

6. lgbasallote

hmm show me

7. julie001

ok

8. julie001

9. julie001

there two separate questions

10. cwrw238

11. julie001

k hold on ill post it up

12. lgbasallote

soooo who's taking flvs geometry again? lol jk

13. cwrw238

i wonder what flvs stand for?

14. m_charron2

Since you're looking to prove using side-side-side, your best bet is to pick the option where you have sides in the answer (that's for question 1)

15. lgbasallote

yeah this can definitely be solved by anyone who has studied geometry..not just flvs geometry...however most of us tend to forget proving after we're through with it heh

16. lgbasallote

flvs is some sort of online school i believe

17. cwrw238

oh ok

18. julie001

Which fact could you use to help prove that ΔABDΔACB using Side-Side-Side? ∠ACB ≅ ∠DBA ∠BAC + ∠BCA = 90˚ DB over AD = BC over AB AD congruent to CB

19. julie001

im lost wat would the answer be???

20. m_charron2

For question 1, the second answer tells you that at least 2 sides are proportionnal, which is a very good start in the direction of S-S-S. I mean, you'd still need to prove that the 3rd side is proportionnal for a full proof, but that one is one of the steps (which is what they seem to want.

21. m_charron2

For question 2, it looks a lot harder than it actually is. You don't need to go any further than the first 3 lines. If in the figure you're looking at all 3 statements are true, then you're all set! For example, we know it won't be figure 1 because AB and AC are not perpendicular.

22. julie001

so the answer would be the first one?

23. m_charron2

No, since the first given statement is not true in that figure (AB is not perpendicular to AC)