anonymous
  • anonymous
An isosceles trapezoid has an area of 21540 feet. What are the lengths of each base and the height?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
schrodinger
  • schrodinger
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
pfenn1
  • pfenn1
What does the fact that it is an isosceles triangle tell you about the sides of the triangle?
anonymous
  • anonymous
They're the same.
pfenn1
  • pfenn1
Sorry, I meant isosceles trapezoid.|dw:1342964621092:dw|A trapezoid is a quadrilateral with exactly one pair of parallel sides. In a trapezoid the parallel sides are called bases. A pair of angles that share a base as a common side are called a pair of base angles. A trapezoid with the two non-parallel sides the same length is called an isosceles trapezoid. The base angles of an isosceles trapezoid are equal in measure.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

pfenn1
  • pfenn1
The area is given by\[A = \frac12(a+b)h\]
pfenn1
  • pfenn1
Do you have enough information to solve this problem?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm not sure.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't think you have enough information actually... The two figures below could potentially have the same area |dw:1342966291436:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
In the same way that the can: |dw:1342966455204:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
That was all the information I was given. It's for an area of a playground.
anonymous
  • anonymous
But you see what I mean with the rectangle right? What's 2m times 8m? 16m\(^2\) right?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yes. What I'm doing now is using the formula for the area of a trapezoid (.5h(b1+b2)) and made b1 = h (to simplify things a bit).
anonymous
  • anonymous
And then I used a graph to see what points could fit the bases more realistically. I got b1 = h = 120 and b2 = 239.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Would that be an isosceles trapezoid then? How could I tell?
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[21540 = (1/2)b _{1}(b _{1}+b _{2})\] \[(43080-b _{1}^{2})/b _{1}=b _{2}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
b1=120 and b2=239 happens to fit that.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Whoa not so fast there... look: Prime factorization of your area: 21540 ft\(^2\) = 2 * 2 * 3 * 5 * 359 * ft * ft There's going to more than one correct, whole-unit answer! That's my point, you need a bit more information. 120 + 239 = 359 1/2 * (359) * 120 = 21540, correct! But... so is: 1/2 * (139 + 220) * 120 = 21540, also correct!
anonymous
  • anonymous
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IsoscelesTrapezoid.html
anonymous
  • anonymous
As I said, more than one correct, whole # answer. Let roots also be include in options for answers, and you'll potentially get an unlimited set of correct answers. You need more information. If the goal was to find just one of them, then you're good. But there's more than one answer here. ;-)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Indeed. It's for a playground so I'd rather have a iso trap with more of a square inner area rather than a elongated, skinny inner area.
anonymous
  • anonymous
If you want to find, whole number answers for these, you'll need to always write out prime factorizations as the first step. A calculus version of this problem would ask you to find the local minimum or maximum for something, or approaching a specific value (like if we needed the longest side to be no more than 200m)
anonymous
  • anonymous
Make sense?
anonymous
  • anonymous
I was thinking about using the calculus approach but this is just for a college geometry course. So, I'm trying to think in a geometric aspect rather than a calculus aspect.
anonymous
  • anonymous
And yes, I understand. Thank you for your help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Ok this question got me thinking, I'm going to make a challenge question for the bored people who like mental puzzles from this original question :-D (don't worry I'll link it back @MWSiOUX )
anonymous
  • anonymous
Awesome!

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.