anonymous
  • anonymous
prove using mathematical induction \[x ^{n} - y^{n} = (x-y)(x^{n-1} + x^{n-2}y +.....+ xy^{n-2} + y^{n-1}\] I'm not even able to prove it true for n =1 . How could one reduce the term in the second bracket to 1 ?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
experimentX
  • experimentX
|dw:1343194234112:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
fundamental theorem of algebra
experimentX
  • experimentX
n=1 is the base case

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
@experimentX 1 is the base case but it also has to be proved first.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm unable to reduce the expression in the second bracket as it involves inverse terms with dont cancel to 1
experimentX
  • experimentX
in your formula n-1 > 0, but n-1 =0 for n=1
anonymous
  • anonymous
well u can do it this way.......... (x-y)(x^n+y^n+.....) (x^(n) - y^(n))(x-y)+ y(x-y)(xn−1+xn−2y+.....+xyn−2
experimentX
  • experimentX
|dw:1343194693791:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
@experimentX is that the final step?
experimentX
  • experimentX
no .. not really, currently, i cannot think using induction.
anonymous
  • anonymous
no it's purely based on induction.....
experimentX
  • experimentX
it proves directly using geometric sum
anonymous
  • anonymous
u prove very dumb things using induction/by contradiction...........
anonymous
  • anonymous
so now by induction.....we have xn−yn=(x−y)(xn−1+xn−2y+.....+xyn−2+yn−1 by induction
anonymous
  • anonymous
nd we need to prove xn+1−yn+1=(x−y)(xn+xny+.....+xyn-1+yn......
anonymous
  • anonymous
so try showing that (x−y)(xn+xny+.....+xyn-1+yn...... = xn+1−yn+1
anonymous
  • anonymous
if we follow induction methods then as per @experimentX the formula is valid only for natural indexes . so n =1 gets proved . for n+1 could be proved by solving the RHS instead of adding any term to the value for the equation for n.
experimentX
  • experimentX
|dw:1343195660262:dw| i guess ... certainly, other ways are more intuitive
experimentX
  • experimentX
\[ (x-y)(x^n + x^{n-1}y + x^{n-2}y^2 + ... +y^n) \\ = x^n(x-y) + y (x-y)(x^{n-1}+x^{n-2}y + ...+y^{n-2}) \\ = x^n(x-y)+y (x^n - y^n) = x^{n+1} - y^{n+1}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
I wanted to have a mathematical Induction proof of the problem . But as it comes out the problem needs to have certain assumptions and can't be explained using mathematical induction in the normal way. Assumptions : 1. n > 1 so as shown by @experimentX we need to work the problem from RHS to LHS to prove the second condition of the induction thoerem.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.