At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the **expert** answer you'll need to create a **free** account at **Brainly**

AT FIRST. do u know what a degree of polynomial means.

\[3x^3+(3x^2/2)−(3x/2)+(3/2)\]
is this correct?

for 1.?

simplify that.

Is my answer correct?

|dw:1343207441484:dw|

how about for no. 2 could you help me?

can u simplify this plz

I DONT THINK YOUR ANSWER IS CORRECT.

ok

FOR NUMBER 2)
do u know factor theorem

could I make \[(x-1/2) -------> (2x-1)\] ????????

|dw:1343207772794:dw|

NOW do u know factor theorem?
and did u get answer for 1)

\[3x^3-(3x^2/2)−3x−(3/2)\]

am I correct now?

NOPE.

BUT U R VERY CLOSE

I'll do it again :)

u just made the sign mistake

could I make (x-1/2) into (2x-1)
because my teacher said there should be no fractions?

|dw:1343208282102:dw|

is the correct answer

could I make (x-1/2) into (2x-1) ??????

NOPE because|dw:1343208355724:dw|

but if |dw:1343208386811:dw|

that's what I mean for the second part

because|dw:1343208443188:dw|

isn't that it is zero so that it is possible?

|dw:1343205903760:dw|

IF it is equal to zero then yes u can because |dw:1343208534245:dw|

|dw:1343205945423:dw|

so what?

I got the correct answer :)

and what is that

it mean that there zeroes are both 1/2

so you can use either of the two?

yeah. BUT only in that case. U cannot use this in simplification.

AND NOW SHALL WE BEGIN NO. 2

yup :)

do u know factor theorem.

wait I am trying to solve 1 with (2x-1) :)

I got the same answer :)

is that correct?
could you improve my definition of factor ?

No u r defination is correct. And can u use this to solve this problem

how
I am confused with the question?

I am thinking of distributing -3 to x

but I can't explain why it is correct :)

ohh, I think it also has remainder theorem? :)

YEAH.

now can u

|dw:1343207190855:dw|

I added =0 so that the remainder will be equal to zero making (x+3) a product ?

solve for k

am I correct with my reason?

yeah

k=1/2

@sauravshakya thank you very much for your help :)

U r WELCOME. AND best of luck