Problem Set 3: 2A-12d: Give the quadratic approximation for y=ln(cosx). I understand how the solution is -(1/2)x^2 (because L(ln(1+u))=u), but when I first attempted the problem, I did the following: y=ln(cosx) e^y=e^(ln(cosx)) e^y=cosx approximating, 1+y+(1/2)y^2=1-(1/2)x^2 y=-(1/2)x^2-(1/2)y^2 plugging in ln(cosx) for y, Q(y)=-(1/2)x^2-(1/2)(ln(cosx))^2 This solution seems to be a more accurate (although uglier-looking) approximation of y=ln(cosx) when x is near 0. Looking for insight as to if it is incorrect and if so, why?

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions.

A community for students.

Problem Set 3: 2A-12d: Give the quadratic approximation for y=ln(cosx). I understand how the solution is -(1/2)x^2 (because L(ln(1+u))=u), but when I first attempted the problem, I did the following: y=ln(cosx) e^y=e^(ln(cosx)) e^y=cosx approximating, 1+y+(1/2)y^2=1-(1/2)x^2 y=-(1/2)x^2-(1/2)y^2 plugging in ln(cosx) for y, Q(y)=-(1/2)x^2-(1/2)(ln(cosx))^2 This solution seems to be a more accurate (although uglier-looking) approximation of y=ln(cosx) when x is near 0. Looking for insight as to if it is incorrect and if so, why?

OCW Scholar - Single Variable Calculus
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

actually the formula for quadratic approximation is : f(x) = f(0) + f ' (0) * x + f ''(0) (x^2)/2 For, y = ln (cos x) f(0) = 0 f ' (0)= 0 and, f '' (0)= -1 now, substitute to get , y = - 1/2 x^2
I should have mentioned that the question suggests that you solve the problem algebraically using quadratic approximation formulas for basic functions, for instance I used Q(e^x)=1+x+(1/2)x^2 and Q(cosx)=1-(1/2)x^2. edit: I know Q(y)=-(1/2)x^2-(1/2)(ln(cosx))^2 is the wrong answer, which is evident by using the actual quadratic approximation formula, but I don't see why I cannot also solve the problem algebraically using Q(e^x) and Q(cosx).
Okay. So remember that ln (x) = ln [1+(x-1)] Using quadratic approximation, ln [1+(x-1)]= (x-1) - (x-1)^2 /2 = 2x - x^2 /2 -3/2-----(1) so, ln (cos x) = ln [ 1+ ( cos x -1)] hence, ln (cos x) = 2cos x -1/2 cos^2 x -3/2 [using equation 1] = 2 (1 - x^2/2)- 1/2 ( 1- x^2 /2) ^2 - 3/2 [using approximation for cos x] = 2 - x^2 - 1/2 ( 1- x^2)- 3/2 [ we don't need to write terms involving higher powers of x than x^2] = 2- x^2 - 1/2- x^2 /2-3/2 = -1/2 x^2 In this, only the quadratic approximation formula for ln (1+x) and cos x are used.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

The problem with your "Q(y)" approximation is that the term "(1/2)(ln(cosx))^2" is either higher than degree 2 or equal to 0 (depend on whether you choose to approximate ln(cosx) linearly or quadraticly). So, it will be negligible as you already learned from the lecture. Also, the fact that you involve "(1/2)(ln(cosx))^2" as part of your answer for the approximation of ln(cosx) is illogical because if Q(y) is correct, then it's like saying in order to approximate ln(cosx) you had to already know the value of (ln(cosx))^2.

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question