At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

See more answers at brainly.com

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

Do you have actual values? Maybe a diagram will help...

The attached example1.pdf gives the initial condition where
r1(0) = r10 = {1,1} and r2(0) = r20 = {-2,-3}
The line between them, as shown, does not intersect with the origin. Also, shown, however, are velocity vectors
v1 = {1,1} and v2 = {0, 1}.
Thus you can guess that at t = 1, you'll have
r1(1) = {2,2} and r2(1) = {-2,-2}.
That, of course, goes through the origin. The answer for this case would be t = 1. But I'm looking for a symbolic answer.

Sorry, but I gotta go. Great problem.

It's cool, right? Not a homework problem like the other poor summer school kids here...

i guess equating x,y,z coordinates and solving for t would help to find the value of t.

Only 2D

2d cases only ... it's a bit simpler. do you have any other constraints for v?

can you give me the solution you got from Wolf?

r10={Ax0, Ay0},
r20={Bx0, By0},
v1= {Vax, Vay},
v2 = {Vbx, Vby}

can you post the code instead?

Here's the code:
If you can read the nb, explaining would be so much easier lol. Also note that I use Cx and Cy because in the real problem that's the "origin." Just skp it - I replace it later with {0,0}

i think this is a similar Q
http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/5012a650e4b08ffc0ef4add0

No, I don't think we can use that one. It has nothing to do with collision.

man ... you sure know how to program. I'm using MMA as simple calculator.

well, x is a variable ... are you trying to find the velocity and time from given 4 points?

No ,no, no. Look, its hard to explain. But I solved it just now so don't worry about it.

okay!! good for you that you solved!!