Quantcast

A community for students.

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

imagreencat

  • 3 years ago

We were asked to compute for the electric field experience by a point charge P caused by a ring-shaped conductor. And my professor just used Q for the computation. However, when we computed for the electric field experienced by P caused by a charged rod, we used the lambda to derive the charge. Shouldn't the ring problem be computed the same way also?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. mathavraj
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    |dw:1343466065669:dw|lambda is linear charge density....in a ring of radius R AND CENTRE O, consider a small element dl on A and B ON the ring..

  2. mathavraj
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    |dw:1343467409133:dw| sorry the first sentence is at P due to A

  3. imagreencat
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Okay. Thanks!! :)

  4. mathavraj
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    |dw:1343467595714:dw| AT p the cos components due to A and B add up while sin components cancel...so if you integrate this ull get the final ans as

  5. mathavraj
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    |dw:1343467750152:dw| in integrating use the above egns and use the formula for cos theta....so does this solve ur qn..or u have a diff doubt..pls ask it..i think im confusing u

  6. mathavraj
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    |dw:1343468083471:dw|make this correction..its hard to draw

  7. Vincent-Lyon.Fr
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    In this problem, the symmetries of all charged points with respect to the axis do not necessitate to break down \(dq\) in \(dq=\lambda dl\), as you would normally do (e.g. straight line). If you did, you would integrate \(\lambda dl\) as \(\lambda \times 2\pi R\), then you would express \(\lambda = \Large \frac{Q}{2\pi R}\) ... and finally find... \(Q\) It is easier to integrate \(dq\) as \(Q\) straight away.

  8. mathavraj
    • 3 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    so is my ans correct @Vincent-Lyon.Fr

  9. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Sign Up
Find more explanations on OpenStudy
Privacy Policy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.