Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
hali12
Group Title
Let p and q represent the statements:
p: Jose is running track.
q: Jose is not winning the race.
Express the following statement symbolically:
Jose is winning the race..... a) p.. b) q.. c)~q.. d) ~p
 one year ago
 one year ago
hali12 Group Title
Let p and q represent the statements: p: Jose is running track. q: Jose is not winning the race. Express the following statement symbolically: Jose is winning the race..... a) p.. b) q.. c)~q.. d) ~p
 one year ago
 one year ago

This Question is Closed

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
@jim_thompson5910 is this the same as the last ones?
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
q: Jose is not winning the race.
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
~q is the opposite of q
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
So if q says one thing then ~q (NOT q) says the complete opposite thing q says
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
so ~q is like saying Jose is NOT not winning the race ...a bit confusing, but the two "not"s cancel giving us ~q: Jose is winning the race
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
so then its p?
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
p is the statement Jose is running track
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
agreed?
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
does that have anything to do with "Jose is winning the race" ?
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
so "Jose is winning the race" doesn't involve p at all
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
reread what I wrote at the beginning of this thread
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
and hopefully something will click
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
closer, but still no
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
you got it
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
look above to see why
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
I wrote it out at the top
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
ohh i didnt even relize it, wow.... thank you so much, i also have 2 more, i have one that i really dont know
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
its ok, i was wondering about that lol
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Look at the argument below. Which of the following symbolic statements shows the setup used to find the validity of the argument? If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades. Mario got good grades. Therefore, Mario studied hard. p: Mario studies hard. q: Mario gets good grades
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
First off, is that argument valid?
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
oh wait, nvm they're asking a different question
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
a.) [(p → q) ∧ ~q] .'.p b.)[(p → q) → q] ∴ p c.)[(p → q) ∧ q] ∴ q d.) [(p → q) ∧ q] ∴ p
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
hmm interesting way to put it
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
"If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades." translates to ...???
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
p is just "Mario studies hard"
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
how do we incorporate the "he gets good grades" part?
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
good
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
"If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades." translates to p > q
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
now tack on the statement "Mario got good grades" So what does "If Mario studies hard, then he gets good grades. Mario got good grades. " translate to ???
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
[(p → q) ∧ ~q] .'. p
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
not quite
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
~q means he did NOT get good grades, but it clearly says he did
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
[(p → q) ∧ ~q] .'. p
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
[(p>q) ^q] .'. p
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
better
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
so is that it then?
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
yes it is
 one year ago

hali12 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
oh ok, thanks, and this will be the last one i promise,: Which of the following is the equivalent of the inverse statement? a.) the negation of the statement.. b.) the converse of the statement.... c.)the contrapositive of the statement... d.)the conditional statement
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
In general Original = contrapositive and inverse = converse
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
So it's b)
 one year ago

jim_thompson5910 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
the inverse of p > q is ~p > ~q  that's equivalent to ~~q > ~~p which is the same as q > p but this is the converse So this shows that the inverse and the converse represent the same thing
 one year ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.