A community for students. Sign up today!
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
PhoenixFire
 2 years ago
Need help with a proof
The theory is: if 3 divides a^2 then 3 divides a.
Now, they ask for the contrapositive (p>q = ~p>~q), which will be: if 3 does not divide a then 3 does not divide a^2
So now how do you prove the contrapositive:
I'm not sure whether to use proof by cases, direct proof, or any of the other methods of proof.
PhoenixFire
 2 years ago
Need help with a proof The theory is: if 3 divides a^2 then 3 divides a. Now, they ask for the contrapositive (p>q = ~p>~q), which will be: if 3 does not divide a then 3 does not divide a^2 So now how do you prove the contrapositive: I'm not sure whether to use proof by cases, direct proof, or any of the other methods of proof.

This Question is Closed

vf321
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well I don't see what's wrong with proving the original statement and by modus tollens show that the contrapositive is true...

vf321
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If I was to prove anything here I would use variables and show how they factor...
Ask your own question
Ask a QuestionFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.