Open study

is now brainly

With Brainly you can:

  • Get homework help from millions of students and moderators
  • Learn how to solve problems with step-by-step explanations
  • Share your knowledge and earn points by helping other students
  • Learn anywhere, anytime with the Brainly app!

A community for students.

if [x] denotes greatest integer < or = x , then prove that C(n,3) - [ n/3 ] is a natural no. , divisible by 3 for all integer n> or =3

Mathematics
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

C(n,3) here denotes comination, for e.g. C(4,3) = 4! / (4-3)! (3)! likewise..
|dw:1345190132115:dw||dw:1345190209186:dw| n can have only 3 from ... 1) 3k 2) 3k+1 3) 3k+2
am all years..what next ?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

lol..i meant "ears"
|dw:1345190372362:dw| this is just a try man ... i never know the solution beforehand.
that 4 wont be there in the last step...anyways nice... it'll be always divisible by sine its 9*something..and one of k and k-1 is always even so the 2 cancelled out..thus 3k satisfies it.. nice..
i meant it'll always be divisible by 3**
lol ... how ... you always need k of the form to be k, k - 1, k - 2
Oh ... sorry ... such a huge error!! :(((
same thing repeats in other cases .. since you have three terms of m, m+1, m+2 <--- one of them is going to be divisible by 3
and that [n/3] thing is not going to change.
excellent,,thans a lot :)
not really ... i guess i should get some more sleep :)
yeah you must be tired..go and relax..even very sharp minds need sound sleep! ;)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question