anonymous
  • anonymous
With the initial conditions for a two mass system m1 and m2, where neither mass is significantly larger than the other, the resulting DE is unsolvable, right? Assume that they both start at rest: (see DE below) Do things get simpler if I give a starting velocity to both masses? What if I look at position relative to the com of the system?
Physics
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

anonymous
  • anonymous
The DE for the two masses in 2D space in general:\[m_1\frac{d^2\vec r_1}{dt^2}=G\frac{m_1 m_2 (\vec r_2-\vec r_1)}{|\vec r_2-\vec r_1|^3}\](switch necessary subscripts for m2) Making the assumption that they're not moving at first, we know movement will be linear. Make the linear axis "x": \[m_1\frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=G\frac{m_1 m_2 (x_2-x_1)}{|x_2-x_1|^3}=\pm G\frac{m_1m_2}{(x_2-x_1)^2}\]So we get a system of DEs: \[m_1\frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=\pm G\frac{m_1m_2}{(x_2-x_1)^2}\]\[m_2\frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=\mp G\frac{m_1m_2}{(x_2-x_1)^2}\]Still unsolvable to my knowledge...
anonymous
  • anonymous
EDIT: last equation should be\[m_2\frac{d^2x_2}{dt^2}=\mp G\frac{m_1m_2}{(x_2-x_1)^2}\]
experimentX
  • experimentX
consider one of the mass to be at rest and another is accelerating.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
You can't do that though! m_2 is accelerating too!
experimentX
  • experimentX
well if you want a dynamic system then ... it's going to be a system of second order DE.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah... But that's the problem. The DE seems to be unsolvable. My question is asking if there's some clever symmetry (like the com or something) that we can use to get around the DE.
experimentX
  • experimentX
not sure ... first order system is fairly complicated.
experimentX
  • experimentX
plus ... this is non linear :(( looks like there must be some other approach.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah but its not a question from a textbook... I just made this up. There might not be an approach :(.
experimentX
  • experimentX
let me try to ask mathematica. do you want general solution or ... do you have some boundary condition?
experimentX
  • experimentX
didn't get any solution from mathematica.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think I have something that might help simplify a bit (N's 3rd law): \[m_2\frac{d^2x_2}{dt^2}=-m_1\frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}\]\[\int_0^tm_2\frac{d^2x_2}{dt^2}dt=\int_0^t-m_1\frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}dt\]\[m_2(\frac{dx_2}{dt}-v_{i2})=-m_1(\frac{dx_1}{dt}-v_{i1})\]\[v_{i1}, v_{i2}=0 m/s\]\[\int_0^tm_2\frac{dx_2}{dt}dt=\int_0^t-m_1\frac{dx_1}{dt}dt\]\[m_2(x_2(t)-x_{i2})=-m_1(x_1(t)-x_{i1})\]\[x_2(t)=\frac{-m_1(x_1(t)-x_{i1})}{m_2}+x_{i2}\]That seems right. If it is, then we don't have a system of DE's anymore...
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think we get: \[m_1\frac{d^2x_1}{dt^2}=\pm G\frac{m_1m_2}{(-(m_1x_1/m_2)-x_1+c_1)^2}\]\[c_1=\frac{m_1x_{i1}}{m_2}+x_{i2}\]
experimentX
  • experimentX
let dx/dt = v ... dv/dt = dv/dx *dx/dt = v dv/dx not sure if you integrate it wrt dt ...
anonymous
  • anonymous
is \[\int v(t)dt=x(t)\]?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Cause that's all i did.
experimentX
  • experimentX
this doesn't solve x(t) at all ... we need x as explicit function of time. sorry ... i think integration method would work.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It doesn't solve for x(t) as a function of time, but it makes x_2 represented as x_1. This way we have one DE to solve instead of a system, right?
experimentX
  • experimentX
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-body_problem i remember doing this kinda (central force) problem using reduced mass :((
experimentX
  • experimentX
something like |dw:1345580217154:dw|
experimentX
  • experimentX
still this system is interesting ... right now i'm working on first order systems. Maybe i'll start PDE right after it. If i encounter second order system ... i'll try to update.
experimentX
  • experimentX
i think using symmetricity we can simplify this problem for two identical bodies. |dw:1345580536599:dw|
experimentX
  • experimentX
for non identical bodies , the acceleration produced is equal to their ratio of masses |dw:1345580770508:dw|
experimentX
  • experimentX
|dw:1345580931804:dw| choosing initial condition, and choosing a suitable coordinate system, i think .... this is pretty easy to solve x(t) as explicit function of time.
experimentX
  • experimentX
I'm not sure for general case ... with non rest IC.
experimentX
  • experimentX
most probably ... it would be wise to .... page no 306 http://books.google.com.np/books?id=P1kCtNr-pJsC&pg=PA305&lpg=PA305&dq=equation+of+orbit+classical+mechanics&source=bl&ots=ghSw0cFxyW&sig=IxK3JsJoSC79tCaTqeL9wPIAxhA&sa=X&ei=w_AzUKTUL43QrQfNsYHoCA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=equation%20of%20orbit%20classical%20mechanics&f=false
anonymous
  • anonymous
Okay thx i looked at the wiki link. I'm on to something on my own and I'll see if that works.
anonymous
  • anonymous
OK no one else is helping at physics so I'll repost the problem in the math section...
anonymous
  • anonymous
If any1's interested: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/185593/solving-the-de-for-a-two-body-system
experimentX
  • experimentX
try asking this instead. How to solve for general solution of system of this differential equation? |dw:1345676009886:dw|
experimentX
  • experimentX
more over this is just 1D case ... for general 2d case the system of DE could me much worse.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Yeah I know it's 1D I was trying just to tackle this, let alone the 2D.
experimentX
  • experimentX
i guess CM frame of reference is a better choice to solve problem. later we can translate origin to any other choice after we find x and y. Try to simulate this graphically.
experimentX
  • experimentX
since we know, the distance between the objects from CM with be at constant proportion of their masses.
anonymous
  • anonymous
It's okay, I'll just do it out on my own using the CM. Don't worry about it.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.