Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

tiffanymak1996

  • 2 years ago

is this absolutely convergent or conditionally or divergent?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n}\times e ^{\frac{ 1 }{ n }}\]

  2. Herp_Derp
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Divergent...

  3. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes that's the answer given, but i got conditionally throughout the process can u go thru the steps with me?

  4. Herp_Derp
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Well, for some large \(n\), \(e^{1/n}\) is sufficiently close to \(1\) so that we can compare this series to the divergent series:\[\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n\]The larger the \(n\), the closer your series is to this series. Therefore your series diverges. Do you understand why \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^n\) diverges?

  5. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    but, i thought n=1 under the sigma sign...

  6. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    No, tiffany they are telling right here, it is diverges

  7. jeanlouie
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    we have abs(\[(-1)^{n}\times e ^{1/n}\]) -> 1 when \[n \rightarrow \infty\] but if consider \[a_{n}\] = \[(-1)^{n}\times e ^{1/n}\] , then |\[a_{2n}\] - \[a_{2n+1}\]| > 1 with every n > some N it is diverges

  8. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah, what i meant was i know it is divergent, but when i go thru the steps i got conditionally convergence

  9. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    don't understand this part an = (−1)n×e1/n , then | a2n - a2n+1 | > 1 with every n > some N it is diverges

  10. jeanlouie
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i mean, for example, let N = 1000000, then for every n > N, |a_2n - a_(2n+1)| > 1

  11. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Jeanlouie I haven't this type calc for a while since High School, in order for this to be diverges it means the n is closer to 1 or I am lost here?

  12. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    for the ratio test if the lim is <1 then the series converges, if lim >1 or=infinity the series diverges, if lim=1 inconclusive

  13. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i know that testing the series for absolutely convergent or conditionally or divergent is to try the ratio test with absolute value first then the one without.

  14. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    but when i calculate the one with absolute value the limit =1 so inconclusive; when i test the series for the ratio test without absolute value the limit =-1, so it's convergent; that's how i get conditionally convergent.

  15. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    although i know i'm wrong, cause the answer is divergent:(

  16. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    what is the value {1} of this when testing ratio =

  17. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    when testing ratio without the absolute value i got -1

  18. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    How does the value change to -1 I am lost there?

  19. jeanlouie
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 is only an example here, 0.5 or any other \[\epsilon < -2\] is OK, too. when \[n \rightarrow \infty \], \[a_{2n} \rightarrow 1\] and \[a_{2n+1}\rightarrow -1\] ps:sr for my poor English

  20. jeanlouie
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ϵ< 2, sorry

  21. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\rho = \lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty} \frac{ (-1)^{n+1} \times e ^{\frac{ 1 }{ n }}}{ ((-1)^{n})\times e ^{\frac{ 1 }{ n }}\ }\]

  22. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ln both top and bottom

  23. jeanlouie
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah, ρ = -1, you got it

  24. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    becomes:\[\lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty} -\frac{ \frac{ 1 }{ n+1} }{ \frac{ 1 }{ n } } \]

  25. jeanlouie
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no, top or bottom may be negative, we can't use ln here.

  26. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    (the limit is still there but i'm just lazy: then: -n/(n+1) divide top and bottom with n: -1/(1+1/n) substitute infinity: -1/(1+0) =-1

  27. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Tiffany I think you have the right answer.

  28. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i do? but this is like conditionally ; yet the modal answer is divergent...

  29. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Tiffany 1+1n is not -1 it is 2n

  30. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    model, sry

  31. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    2/n not -1

  32. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    you see where this is?

  33. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    in -1/(1+1/n), if i substitute n as infinity, then 1/infinity is 0, so -1/(1+0)=-1/1

  34. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    is this correct?

  35. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    when sub in n, you still have 1+1 which is 2.

  36. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    where does the 1+1 com from?

  37. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so if we look at this -1(1+1/n) would give you add the two ones which would 2/n times that by -1 and what is the answer?

  38. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so sorry, it should be -1/(1+(1/n)) not -1/(1+1/n)

  39. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    -1/1=-1times +1 =-1/n

  40. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty}\frac{ -1 }{ 1+\frac{ 1 }{ n } }\]

  41. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes..

  42. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so... \[\lim_{n \rightarrow +\infty} \frac{ -1 }{ 1+\frac{ 1 }{ n } }\]

  43. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Tiffany can the bottom be 0? or am I missing something here?

  44. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the bottom can't be zero, what i did is just divide top and bottom with n

  45. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and then: \[\frac{ -1 }{ 1+\frac{ 1 }{ \infty } }\]

  46. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and since \[\frac{ 1 }{ \infty }=0\],

  47. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\frac{ -1 }{ 1+0 }=-1\]

  48. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and i did this like 5 times and still don't get why it's divergent...

  49. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    T.T

  50. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    what happens if we -1/1+0=-1 now what if simply the bottom to -1/1=-1 than what?

  51. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if it's -1 then the series is convergent, not divergent.

  52. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes..

  53. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    well, the model answer IS divergent.

  54. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    only if stays at one, -1=-1 if you add one you get 0

  55. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and that's what frustrates me the most.

  56. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok...

  57. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so I am taking the answer can't be 0 for the final answer?

  58. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no, it's not that it can't be 0, just that how do u suddenly +1 after the limit?

  59. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Because the +1 falls within the limit.

  60. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh, ok, thx, i think i get it now. :)

  61. godorovg
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    welcome ...

  62. tiffanymak1996
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    sry for bothering you so long...

  63. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.