At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
hmm,whats that ?
I'm not downloading it.
It's microsoft word 2010.
"Windows cannot open this program" Copy and paste it here.
Ok, just give me a moment.
Kelly wrote the following steps to prove the equation: Given: 2(x – 3) = 5x + 3 Prove: x = –3 Step Mathematical Statement Justification 0 2(x - 3) = 5x + 3 Given 1 2x - 6 = 5x + 3 Distributive Property 2 – 6 = 3x + 3 Subtraction Property of Equality 3 3x + 3 = –6 Transitive Property of Equality 4 3x = –9 Subtraction Property of Equality 5 x = –3 Division Property of Equality Which step of justification is incorrect, and what should the justification for that step be to solve the equation? Step 1; Commutative Property of Multiplication Step 2; Associative Property of Addition Step 3; Symmetric Property of Equality Step 4; Combine Like Terms
There is some stuff missing.
That's what they gave me.
"Distributive property." No need for that. H should have added the like terms.
Actually, the property of equality or adding like terms; It's a matter of how you go at it.
So its the second option.
Watch, I'm going to add like terms. 2x - 6 = 5x + 3 2x - 5x = +6 + 3 3x = 9 x = 3
Thanks!!! :) I now understand fully!
All though both operations are correct; they're only going to ask for one, right?
Is it multiple option or something you write to report?