Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

littlecat

  • 2 years ago

Charge q1 is at origin and charge q3 is at (a,a). Why is unit vector r1,3 written as r1,3 = cosθi + sinθ j = sqrt2/2 (i + j)?

  • This Question is Closed
  1. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Visualization of my question

  2. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Writing...\[\vec{r}_{13} =\cos \theta \hat i + \sin \theta \hat j\]is the same thing as writing...\[\vec r_{13}=r_x\hat i +r_y\hat j\]Can you see where this relationship is derived now?

  3. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hmm.. if it is the same, why was it not written as \[r⃗ 13=iˆ+jˆ\] ? I attempted to use polar co-ordinates which gave me the answer r^ = a (i^ + j^), this eventually leads to a wrong answer in this superposition question

  4. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    also kudos to your superb equation typing skills :)

  5. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    i-hat and j-hat only give an indication of the direction of the vector. By writing...\[\vec r_{13}=\hat i+\hat j\]You are implying that \[\vec r_{13}=1\hat i+1\hat j\]Which is not the case. The i-hat is just a unit vector, only implying direction. If you project the vector r_13 onto the x- and y- axes and break it down into its component vectors you can see where the expression it gives is derived from.

  6. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    As far as where the far RHS of the equation is derived from... Let me see what I can figure out.

  7. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    cos θ = sqrt2/2 = sin θ ... but i'm still confused about the LHS!

  8. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Alright. I don't understand how the middle part of the equation was derived. It seems to be missing a factor of r.|dw:1345972919614:dw|I would think that it would be, then...\[\vec r_{13}=\vec r_{13}\cos \theta \hat i+\vec r_{13}\sin \theta \hat j\]I'm not sure where that r_13 factor is lost.

  9. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the figure shows an isosceles triangle.. why is the projection of the hypothenuse r1,3 not equal to the length a...?

  10. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The projection would be equal to a.\[r_x=a \hat i; r_y=a\hat j\]I believe.

  11. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes! then r_13 = a(i^ + j^) ? but the answer shows r_13 = sqrt2/2 (i^ + j^) :E

  12. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the factor of r may have been lost due to the fact that it is a unit vector... i'm not sure myself

  13. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Oh! It is a unit vector, so that would explain why the factor is lost... And for the other part, hmm.

  14. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I think the issue is that you can't express a unit vector in terms of a constant. Since r is a unit vector and not a standard vector, the following aren't true.\[\hat r \neq a\hat r_x+a\hat r_y\]

  15. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    If r were a standard vector, it would be true, but since it's a unit vector, things work out differently. My understanding of unit vectors is shaky, so, that's about as much as I can tell from it.

  16. littlecat
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    OH that actually helps :) I'll think of it as basic polar co-ordinates x = rcosθ = r sqrt2/2 y = rsinθ = r sqrt 2/2 without the factor r but keeping sqrt2/2 since it is referenced to θ THANKS!

  17. Xishem
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yep. I think that the constant is worked into the unit vector somehow. Unit vectors are really something I should review :P.

  18. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.