Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
KingGeorge
Group Title
KingGeorge's Challenge of the Month! [SOLVED BY @ganeshie8]
Your roommate, Bob, watches at least 1 hour of TV per day, but no more than 11 hours per week, and only in hour increments. Show that in the next seven weeks, there exists some period of consecutive days where Bob watches exactly 20 hours of TV.
 2 years ago
 2 years ago
KingGeorge Group Title
KingGeorge's Challenge of the Month! [SOLVED BY @ganeshie8] Your roommate, Bob, watches at least 1 hour of TV per day, but no more than 11 hours per week, and only in hour increments. Show that in the next seven weeks, there exists some period of consecutive days where Bob watches exactly 20 hours of TV.
 2 years ago
 2 years ago

This Question is Closed

zzr0ck3r Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
your roomate have ocd?
 2 years ago

LolWolf Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
All right, although I can't give a rigorous proof for this (haven't come up with one, yet), I can give a simple argument over why it works. In any week, the maximum of the sum of any one day is 5 hours, if we place three consecutive weeks containing this day in one extreme, the remaining amount of days for each week is one, thus we may choose from six other days to add an amount less than or equal to six (because there are six remaining days of the week which each have one hour), without adding the 5 at one extreme in one of the weeks, yet we can choose a specific amount throughout which can be, at most, one greater than 5. By this, given 7 weeks, we can always construct 20 in sums of consecutive days, if every day holds at least an hour, and the total of the weeks can be at most 11. :) I like the problem, I'm still trying to come up with a more rigorous solution...
 2 years ago

KingGeorge Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Just a note, the rigorous solution I have to this problem, is rather elegant, but there are two key observations one must make to solve it this way. If it is still unsolved, I will post a hint tomorrow.
 2 years ago

mathslover Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
I promise I am not a "challenge lover" though I will wait for the hint...
 2 years ago

KingGeorge Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Also, I'm not following your argument @LolWolf
 2 years ago

LolWolf Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Hmm... it's a little convoluted, but, I'll just wait for the hint to give a definitive, cleaner answer (*if* I can solve it, of course...)
 2 years ago

ganeshie8 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.7
\(d_{49} \le 11*7 = 77\)
 2 years ago

ganeshie8 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.7
call \(d_n\) hours TV watched till \(n\)th day \(1 \le d_1 < d_2 < d_3. ....... < d_{49} \le 77\)
 2 years ago

ganeshie8 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.7
see that above is strictly increasing "\(d_1  d_{49}\)" hence, below is strictly increasing too \(21 \le d_1+20 < d_2 + 20 < d_3+20 ...... < d_{49}+20 \le 97\)
 2 years ago

ganeshie8 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.7
Now take the two sequences together, \(1 \le d_1 < d_2..... < d_{49} \ AND\ d_1 + 20 < d_2 + 20..... < d_{49}+20 \\ \le 97\) we have two sequences, each of them distinct, and 49*2 = 98 total terms. we need to assign 98 terms to (197) integers. now we can apply pigeonhole principle and prove the thing easily 98 pigeons, 97 holes
 2 years ago

KingGeorge Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Perfect. That's almost exactly the solution I have. Could you give a quick explanation of why you used \(d_1+20,d_2 + 20,d_3+20, ......, d_{49}+20\)? (For the benefit of the other readers)
 2 years ago

ganeshie8 Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.7
KingGeorge i see 20 hours constraint coming from "77 hours in 49 days" i feel you will explain it in a better way than me....
 2 years ago

KingGeorge Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Very well. Consider the sets \[D_1=\{d_1,d_2,...,d_{49}\}\]\[D_2=\{d_1+20,d_2+20,...,d_{49}+20\}\]\[A=D_1\cup D_2\]Where \(d_i\) was defined above by @ganeshie8. Note that if \(D_1\cap D_2\neq\emptyset\), then there exists some \(d_r,d_s\) such that \(d_s=d_r+20\). This implies that in the days \(r+1, r+2, ..., s\) Bob watched exactly 20 hours of TV.
 2 years ago

KingGeorge Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Now, note that since these are all distinct since Bob watches at least 1 hour per day. So we have that \(1\le d_1\) and \(d_{49}+20\le 97\), and \(d_{49}+20\) is the maximum of set \(A\). So we have a set with 98 elements, and 97 numbers to choose from. Therefore, we have a repeated number by the pigeonhole principle. Since \(D_1\) has no repeats by definition, as well as \(D_2\), it must be that \(D_1\cap D_2\neq\emptyset\), so we are done.
 2 years ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.