• anonymous
In your opinion, can more than one idea of freedom co-exist within a single nation? Within the world?
  • schrodinger
See more answers at
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly


Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

  • anonymous
I think there are more than one already; since our actions are free even though the retribution is decided. The goal, I believe, should be to acquire a state of a unified idea of freedom. At least this is what logic dictates. The post-modern 'meta' thinker might disagree.
  • anonymous
In short, yes, freedom can have many meanings, and within the general meanings it can funcition. However the answer can also be no beucase freedom isn't absolute. To have true freedom you would have to infringe on the rights of others. In society, we would say that the thief who is stealing food is wrong, even if he's starving and we would find a way to make sure he is not infringing on the shopkeepers right to sell and make a living. Some would take all rights away from the thief (prision) while others would let the thief have freedom, but try to rehibilitate him. This is a simplistic expination to why freedom is complicated.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.