Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

nj1202

  • 2 years ago

A semicircle of radius r is in the first and second quadrants, with the center of curvature at the origin. Positive charge +Q is distributed uniformly around the left half of the semicircle, and negative charge -Q is distributed uniformly around the right half of the semicircle. What is the magnitude of the net electric field at the origin produced by this distribution of charge? Express your answer in terms of the variables Q, r, and appropriate constants. Thanks in advance for any help in approaching this. Can't quite nab the hang of this one xD

  • This Question is Closed
  1. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1346990452737:dw|

  2. akash123
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1346993325948:dw|

  3. akash123
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Take elementary charge -dq in the ist quadrant at angle theta...electric field E due to this electric charge at O: dE= -dq/ 4pi epsilon(0) r^2

  4. akash123
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and its dirction will be radially outward..

  5. akash123
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    now break dE into tow components along x and y axis respectively...dE cos(theta) and dE sin(theta)

  6. akash123
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1346993841419:dw|

  7. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So I actually was doing an easier problem earlier where this semicircle was all positive Q. And I found: \[E=\frac{ Q }{ 2\pi ^{2} \epsilon _{0}r ^{2}}\] Can I use this at all to help me in this?

  8. akash123
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    can you show me the solution of this...I think answer will be something different...but how it'll help you in this?

  9. Kainui
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Let's simplify this by considering symmetry. Break up the electric field into x and y and see if any of them cancel. |dw:1346994485662:dw| Hey, what do you know, the y-coordinate cancels out and now you have a slightly easier problem to deal with.

  10. Kainui
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Not to mention you have the exact same contribution from the electric field from one and the other going to the right, so you really only need to solve for the electric field of one and multiply that by 2 to get the magnitude right.

  11. Kainui
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    It's tempting to say that the electric field is related to 2 times the integral of cos theta from 0 to pi/2, but it's not I think lol.

  12. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I typed in demitris's answer. It said that it was missing or had an incorrect numerical multiplier. Any idea what that could mean? he's probably very close to being right, the system is just being picky about what it has entered into it...

  13. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    What does your k = ? 1/4piEo ?

  14. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yea, okay. I just don't see how you went from the last part in the 2nd to last drawing to cancelling the 4s. Where is like Eo?

  15. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    But where did Eo disappear to in your last step?

  16. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    OH! cuz you had to double. so you wrote the constant, and then the numerator doubled. got it... but i still don't understand why Eo is missing....

  17. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1346997418458:dw|

  18. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ok.. hopefully that does the trick and now it's right xD

  19. nj1202
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Just to let you know, what i wrote was right. it said correct online :) thank you so much for all the help !

  20. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.