Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

ParthKohli Group Title

Are standard basis vectors constant?

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    no, what do you mean

    • 2 years ago
  2. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    are vectors even important?

    • 2 years ago
  3. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    or better yet...is Math important?

    • 2 years ago
  4. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    In one of the examples, I noticed that they made a quick substitution for the following vectors:\[\overrightarrow{i} = \langle 0,0,1\rangle\]\[\overrightarrow{j} = \langle 0,1,0\rangle\]\[\overrightarrow k = \langle0,0,1\rangle\]So are vector i, vector j and vector k defined vectors?

    • 2 years ago
  5. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    im thinking these are \(\hat i, \; \hat j, \; \hat k\) for some reason

    • 2 years ago
  6. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/VectorArithmetic.aspx "Standard Basis Vectors Revisited"

    • 2 years ago
  7. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    i must be <1,0,0>

    • 2 years ago
  8. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    yes you are

    • 2 years ago
  9. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh yes,\[\overrightarrow{i} = \langle1,0,0\rangle\]Sorry... messed up

    • 2 years ago
  10. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    still thinking that's supposed to be \(\hat i\)

    • 2 years ago
  11. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    OK, but is \(\hat{i}\) the same as \(\overrightarrow{i}\)?

    • 2 years ago
  12. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    \[\hat i = \; \text{positive x-axis}\]

    • 2 years ago
  13. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    no they are not

    • 2 years ago
  14. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    OK

    • 2 years ago
  15. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    and yes, i is defined as unit vector in x direction j is defined as unit vector in y direction k is defined as unit vector in z direction and denoted by i^ as said by lg

    • 2 years ago
  16. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    \[\vec i \implies \text{vector}\] \[\hat i \implies \text{vector component}\]

    • 2 years ago
  17. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I don't really get any of those, but thanks :P

    • 2 years ago
  18. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeah... @hartnn that's right!

    • 2 years ago
  19. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    think of it somehow like this: i => x j => y k => z

    • 2 years ago
  20. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeah, I do!

    • 2 years ago
  21. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\vec\imath=\langle 1,0,0\rangle\]\[\vec\jmath=\langle 0,1,0\rangle\]\[\vec k=\langle 0,0,1\rangle\]

    • 2 years ago
  22. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    + i => positive x-axis -i => negative x-axis + j => positive y-axis - j => negative y-axos k => positive z axis -k => negative z-axis

    • 2 years ago
  23. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    That's a nice way to handle it! :)

    • 2 years ago
  24. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    can u imagine a vector along x-direction and magnitude = 1.......thats i|dw:1347180055694:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  25. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    one more thing you should know, the expression for vectors is given as \[\vec A = x\hat i + y\hat j + z\hat k\] or something like that

    • 2 years ago
  26. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    that means i is a vector component for x j is a vector component for y k is a vector component for z

    • 2 years ago
  27. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    so when you have \[\hat i\] that means \[\vec A = 1\hat i + 0\hat j + 0\hat k\] so there's no value for y or z so it just lies on +x-axiis

    • 2 years ago
  28. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    lol, thanks... I don't think I can really get it now. I'm not a genius :P

    • 2 years ago
  29. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    yes. vectors are hard to grasp

    • 2 years ago
  30. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    in polar coordinates the basis vectors change direction

    • 2 years ago
  31. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    btw... why are you so keen in learning new things all the time @ParthKohli ?

    • 2 years ago
  32. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Because I can't stand the fact that I can't answer so many questions on the site, and there are people like you who know a lot. :|

    • 2 years ago
  33. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    none of us is 12 years old.

    • 2 years ago
  34. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm 13 lol, and I don't think that age makes a difference :)

    • 2 years ago
  35. UnkleRhaukus Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the difference is 1 year

    • 2 years ago
  36. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I mean that age contributes nothing to how much a person knows...

    • 2 years ago
  37. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    with age comes wisdom

    • 2 years ago
  38. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Actually, I should be ashamed that it took me 13 long years do this all.

    • 2 years ago
  39. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I think your time is better spent on learning mathematics than thinking about all this :-)

    • 2 years ago
  40. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    lol,so u wanted to know everything from birth!!??

    • 2 years ago
  41. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    eww @Ishaan94 learn math

    • 2 years ago
  42. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    We evolved with certain rules that made no sense. For example: 1) Babies are supposed to play with toys. 2) Adults are supposed to watch movies with stripping scenes. 3) Kids don't know anything. I feel that it is *us* who evolved with these beliefs :) a baby can do calculus as well, but we made the baby play with toys.

    • 2 years ago
  43. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    right

    • 2 years ago
  44. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    An average baby doesn't have the necessary IQ to do calculus.

    • 2 years ago
  45. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    WE MADE HIS IQ DOWN BY MAKING HIM PLAY WITH TOYS.

    • 2 years ago
  46. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    No. I don't think so.

    • 2 years ago
  47. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    to learn calculus you need to know algebra. to know algebra you need to know arithmetic. to know arithmetic you need to know kinesthetics

    • 2 years ago
  48. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    In fact a playful childhood might help better in developing one's mind.

    • 2 years ago
  49. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    That's what YOU believe.

    • 2 years ago
  50. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    a baby is supposed to enjoy, not learn math ..... thats why we me him/her to play ....

    • 2 years ago
  51. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    if your theory is right @ParthKohli then i can confidently concur that online schools educates people very well

    • 2 years ago
  52. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    lol

    • 2 years ago
  53. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    online schools miseducate people because they keep jumping from topics to topics; skipping fundamentals

    • 2 years ago
  54. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    that is also why you should not disturb the status quo

    • 2 years ago
  55. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm... not.... jumping, right?

    • 2 years ago
  56. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    you are. you're trying to learn this without the necessary fundamentals

    • 2 years ago
  57. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    For example?

    • 2 years ago
  58. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    i think u are going fast just because u want to answer more questions here..

    • 2 years ago
  59. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeah, I am, but I didn't skip algebra... and I didn't skip logarithms... not even trigonometry.

    • 2 years ago
  60. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thus, not leaving fundamentals.

    • 2 years ago
  61. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    How much time did you spend on Algebra, Trig?

    • 2 years ago
  62. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    however, you skipped topics

    • 2 years ago
  63. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Ishaan94 a lot

    • 2 years ago
  64. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    there's a reason they give 4 years to algebra

    • 2 years ago
  65. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I would need a definitive answer.

    • 2 years ago
  66. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    But I have managed to do it early... nothing's really wrong!

    • 2 years ago
  67. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    it's not because people are slow-learners

    • 2 years ago
  68. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Parth I think you should spend your time more on Algebra and Trig. Calculus isn't tricky. IMO doesn't even asks question from calculus. Get a good book on Algebra and start solving it.

    • 2 years ago
  69. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    agreed

    • 2 years ago
  70. ParthKohli Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    g2g :) thanks all!

    • 2 years ago
  71. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    honestly @Ishaan94 don't you think kohli could be a valedictorian if only he tried using the time he spends doing calculus to just master algebra? if he has this kind of knowledge on calc, then he must hve spent a lot of time, enough to have made him a valedictorian

    • 2 years ago
  72. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    i think it's a false cause to study for OpenStudy rather than to study for academics

    • 2 years ago
  73. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hmm I am not against Parth learning Calculus but the thing is Algebra could be a lot trickier than Calculus. So it's really important that one spends significant amount of time on Algebra. As for academics I don't think 8th grade is really complex. He could still be a valedictorian. :-)

    • 2 years ago
  74. lgbasallote Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    he still has other subjects though. math is not everything

    • 2 years ago
  75. Ishaan94 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I might be wrong person to discuss about getting grades in school. I never really payed much attention to grades.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.