help with AP calc hw plz!

- anonymous

help with AP calc hw plz!

- Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com

Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

- chestercat

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

- Hero

Simply posting your actual question would be great

- anonymous

im going to take a pic :3

- anonymous

##### 1 Attachment

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

the limit is x->-1/2+

- Hero

You've got like 5 questions circled. Which one is it?

- anonymous

#38

- campbell_st

perhaps factorising the numerator and denominator will allow you to cancel a common factor

- anonymous

kk

- anonymous

limit as x goes to ???

- Hero

-1/2

- campbell_st

there is a common factor that is evident when you factorise numerator and denominator

- anonymous

then replace \(x\) by \(-\frac{1}{2}\) if you get a number, that is your answer any rational function is continuous on its domain so the limit and the value are the same

- Hero

I think @campbell_st is right. You should try factoring the numerator and denominator first before plugging in x = -1/2

- anonymous

if you get \(\frac{2}{0}\) then you know you can factor both top and bottom as \((2x+1)(\text{something)}\)

- anonymous

i wouldn't do that, i would plug in first

- campbell_st

the other thing about eliminating a common factor is that it makes the substitution calculation easier

- anonymous

if you get something other than \(\frac{0}{0}\) then that is the answer if you do get \(\frac{0}{0}\) then you know how to factor

- Hero

If you plug in first, you're definitely going to get a denominator you won't like

- anonymous

@campbell_st i suck at factoring, so i like to know if i can factor first if i know i have a zero of a polynomial, i know already how to factor it that is why i would check first and not waste my time factoring, in case for example it does not factor over the integers

- anonymous

so plugin -1/2 im kinda confused

- Hero

Why waste your time trying to evaluate before factoring? Seems silly

- campbell_st

lol... people get lost with squaring and substituting negative fractions... its really what works best you each of us

- anonymous

what i am trying to say is that if i replace \(x\) by \(-\frac{1}{2}\) i know it must factor as \((2x+1)\times (\text{whatever})\)

- Zarkon

rational functions are continuous on their domain..if you plug in the value and you get a real number then that is the answer to the limit problem

- anonymous

because it tells me exactly how to factor otherwise i am doing the dance of what two numbers blah blah blah

- campbell_st

here is the factorised version I hope... \[\lim_{x \rightarrow -\frac{1}{2}} \frac{(2x + 1)(3x -1)}{(2x + 1)(2x - 3)}\]

- anonymous

kk

- Hero

@satellite lost me. You're telling me that plugging in x = -1/2 tells you which two numbers you use to factor it?

- anonymous

@hero both @zarkon and i answered the question "why evaluate first" i think

- anonymous

yes, by the "factor theorem" if \(r\) is a root of a polynomial \(p(x)\) then we know \(p(x)=(x-r)q(x)\)

- Hero

No, @zarkon said something I already knew. The problem is, if you plug in x = -1/2 in this case, you clearly get a zero denominator

- Agent47

This limit is begging for L'Hopital's Rule.....

- anonymous

it is not some miracle that each time you get \(\frac{0}{0}\) you can factor and cancel. it is precisely because of the factor theorem. you HAVE to be able to factor out the zeros

- campbell_st

it doesn't need L'Hopital ... just factor to find it.... don't over think it

- anonymous

im kinda confuzzled a bit :3

- Agent47

i can do lhopital in my head on this... but i guess it depends

- Hero

That's because there's too many people trying to give their version of how to solve it.

- anonymous

what i am trying to say is this: you want the limit of a rational function as x approaches some number first thing you should do is check what you get when you evaluate the function at that number if you get a number back, that is your answer and you are done

- campbell_st

looking at the type of questions you need to factorise to find the limit..

- Agent47

abanna, just listen to satellite, he's always right lol

- Hero

I object to that statement^

- anonymous

if you get \(\frac{a}{0}\) where \(a\) is some non zero number, then there is no limit

- campbell_st

@abannavong have a look above at my factorised version.. eliminate the common factor then substitute for your limit.

- anonymous

and if you get \(\frac{0}{0}\) then you know to factor and cancel AND you know how to factor

- Hero

I see what you're saying now, @satellite. I usually do that part in my head first, but not on paper.

- anonymous

oh ok

- anonymous

because for example, in this case we see that \(-\frac{1}{2}\) gives 0 that tells us that it MUST factor as \((2x+1)(\text{whatever})\) because \(2x+1\) has a zero at \(-\frac{1}{2}\)

- campbell_st

@abannavong what level of maths is this...

- anonymous

and your job is then only to find the other factor, as @campbell_st wrote above

- Agent47

AB calculus, aka cal 1

- anonymous

AP Calc :3

- campbell_st

ok... so still high school... just I'm in australia...

- anonymous

yeah in grade 12

- campbell_st

thanks... I think you get 5/8 as the limit... good luck

- anonymous

thank you @campbell_st

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.