If I need to find a closed solution for the summation of x*a^x from x = 0 to n, what do I do? For starters, I've decided to do an integral from 0 to b of the same function, but now I have 2 variables! ah! Help please :D

- anonymous

- Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com

Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)

- jamiebookeater

I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!

- anonymous

The only hint I was given was to take the integral of the function I was trying to take the summation of. But, now I have\[\int\limits_{0}^{b}x*a^x da\]

- anonymous

I can't seem to do a u-sub that will work for me.

- anonymous

I want to assume that x is a constant and pull it outside, but I don't know if I can do that.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

## More answers

- anonymous

you can, since youre differentiating with respect to a.

- anonymous

Because S = (0)a^(0) + (1)a^(1)...+(n)a^(n); you see why I think it's a constant?

- anonymous

Yes! But what happens to the other x?

- anonymous

wel, the other x is a constant too right?

- anonymous

whats the integral of a^x , if x is constant?

- anonymous

I have a wonderful solution to this, I believe.

- anonymous

Bring it :D

- anonymous

hm, you are right extremity

- anonymous

\[\int\limits_{0}^{b}a^x da\]?

- anonymous

\[ \sum_{x=0}^n xa^{\lambda x} = \sum_{x=0}^n \frac{d}{d\lambda} \frac{a^{\lambda x}}{\ln(a)} = \frac{1}{\ln(a)} \frac{d}{d\lambda} \sum_{x=0}^n a^{\lambda x}\]
\[ = \frac{1}{\ln(a)} \frac{d}{d\lambda} \frac{1- a^{\lambda (n+1)}}{1- a^\lambda}\]

- anonymous

\[a^{x+1} /(x+1)\]

- anonymous

woah.

- anonymous

where'd you get lambda?

- anonymous

just made it up. Set it to 1 when you're all done.

- anonymous

it's to differentiate x from the exponent?

- anonymous

yep. I may have made a typo, but I'm getting
\[ \frac{a(n+1) -a^n - n}{(1-a)^2} \]
as a final result. Assuming of course that a does not equal 1.

- anonymous

Oops, I did make a typo

- anonymous

should be
\[ \frac{na^{n+2} - na^{n+1} - a^{n+1} + a}{(1-a)^2} \]

- anonymous

And wolfram alpha confirms. Awesome.

- anonymous

By the way, if a = 1, obviously the sum is just
\[ \sum_{x=0}^n x = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}\]

- anonymous

lol

- anonymous

Thanks! I am going back over this to make sure I understand. Thanks for all your help!

- anonymous

No problem. Be careful with your derivatives. And @TuringTest / @Gravion should recognize this technique.... ;)

- anonymous

:D

- anonymous

Are you still on?

- anonymous

I have a question: what if I need to use the hint (i.e., that's what they want us to do). I kinda see what you are doing, but I can move on from the integral from 0 to infinity of x*a^x

- anonymous

the integral doesn't converge, so...

- anonymous

That is the hint. I integrated, then differentiated.

- anonymous

And it should converge if a is sufficiently small.

- anonymous

hm...

- anonymous

If |a| < 1, that reduces to
\[ \frac{a}{(1-a)^2} \]

- anonymous

I'm sorry, I'm thrown off by the ln(a). I can't get it in my own work...

- anonymous

I'm getting a^(x+1)/ (x+1) though, which I can use on the limits of intergration...but then I get x[infinity - a] which doesn't make sense!

- anonymous

Did you follow my reasoning up until the part where you take the derivative?

- anonymous

um, actually no. I don't understand d/dlambda

- anonymous

you said you made lamda up---to differentiate from the other x (I guess) but then how do you also do a derivative for it?

- anonymous

wait, the "integrate then differentiate" thing is what I am supposed to do (that's the hint they gave" but I dunno why I can't understand this!

- anonymous

I invented a parameter to put in the problem, differentiated and integrated with respect to said parameter, and at the end of the day, after everything was done, I set that parameter to 1.

- anonymous

It's not a trivial series to sum, what class are you doing this for?

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.