Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

\[y''+y'-2y=x+sin2x\] \[y(0)=1\] \[y'(0)=0\] auxiliary equation: \[r^2+r-2=0\] \[r_1=-2, r_2=1\] \[y_c(x)=C_1e^{-2x}+C_2e^x\] \[y''+y'-2y=x\] \[y_{p1}(x)=Ax+B\] \[y_{p1}'(x)=A\] \[y_{p1}''(x)=0\] \[A=-\frac12\] \[B=-1\] \[y_{p1}=-\frac12x-1\]

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this and thousands of other questions

Now on to yp_2, where I'm having some trouble...here is how far I've gotten.
\[y''+y'-2y=sin2x\] \[y_{p2}(x)=Axcos2x+Bxsin2x\] \[y_{p2}'(x)=2Acos2x-2Axsin2x+2Bsin2x+2Bxcos2x\] \[y_{p2}''(x)=-4Asin2x-4Axcos2x+4Bcos2x-4Bxsin2x\]

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

really i am sorry i have no clue
there is no need to select Ax cos 2x + Bx sin 2x the reason is , if you take out x as a common factor, then that "x" is actually part of a solution so you are bound to get incorrect solutions
So what should I do?
Did you try this using wronskian
I don't know what that is
can you use wikipedia to understand that method, use the keywords "wronskian equation" or "wronskian determinant" I would use that approach to solve, I will use the method followed by you only under the cases where wronskian is 0
did you look up wronskian
You made a mistake assuming the form of \(y_{p_2}\): I don't know if you've heard of the concept of an "annihilator" before, but the differential operator \((D^2+4)\) annihilates \(\sin2x\). If we apply it to your ODE, we get:\[\begin{align}(D^2+4)(D^2+D-2)y&=(D^2+4)\sin2x,\\(m^2+4)(m^2+m-2)&=0,\\(m\pm2i)(m+2)(m-1)&=0.\end{align}\]Hence, \(y_{p_2}=A\cos2x+B\sin2x\). This is different from what you got up there; notice that there is no \(x\) multiplying neither \(\cos\) nor \(\sin\). Now try and try and wrap it up as you would from here.
why is it \[D^2+4\]? Is it standard for the annihilator method or where did the 4 come from?
I''m watching Khan's academy videos right now...I should have a better understanding in an hour or so
The differential operator\[\left[D^2-2\alpha D+\left(\alpha^2+\beta^2\right)\right]^n\]anihilates each of the functions\[e^{\alpha x}\cos\beta x, xe^{\alpha x}\cos\beta x, \dots, x^{n-1}e^{\alpha x}\cos\beta x,\\e^{\alpha x}\sin\beta x, xe^{\alpha x}\sin\beta x, \dots, x^{n-1}e^{\alpha x}\sin\beta x.\]
In your case, \(\alpha=0\) and \(\beta=2\).
I'm sure @across knows exactly what she's talking about and I don't, but I would just make a single \(y_p\) which is the sum of the two individual ones
the guess for \(\cos(Ax)\) or \(\sin(Ax)\) is \(y_p=B\cos(Ax)+C\sin(Ax)\)
so add your two together and get\[y_p=Ax+B+C\cos(2x)+D\cos(2x)\]
not sure why you picked up the extra x on \(y _2\)
That's correct. It follows from the principle of superposition given differential operators are linear transformations. :) I was thrown off a little bit when I saw @MathSofiya formulating two particular solutions, but then told myself: "heck, it's the same thing anyway." So I went with her approach, but I'd also combine them. @TuringTest, that's right, but the term with the \(D\) coefficient should be a \(\sin\) (you could invert them, too, it doesn't matter).
@across oh yes, of of course, typo :P I'm also now remembering the annihilator thing you did, the need to add the 4 coming from differntiating sin(2x) twice and getting -4 right? (sorry to interject, just trying to remember)
I still have two more videos to watch...brb, (hopefully it will make more sense then...)
or look quickly at example 8-d here (not that POMN is that thorough...)
http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/DE/UndeterminedCoefficients.aspx
as was said, it's the superposition principle at work is all
That's right, @TuringTest. Given \(\sin2x\), applying the differential operator \(D^2+4\) to it yields:\[\begin{align}(D^2+4)\sin2x&=D^2\sin2x+4\sin2x\\&=2D\cos2x+4\sin2x\\&=-4\sin2x+4\sin2x\\&=0.\end{align}\]:)
thanks! Gotta get sharp on that technique
Let's start from \[y''+y'-2y=x+sin2x\] and \[y_p\] It's still not making much sense
if it were just g(x)=x our guess would be Yp=Ax+B, right?
correct
and if it were just g(x)=sin(2x) what would the guess be?
Asin2x+Bcos2x?
right, but let's call A=C and B=D so as not to confuse them with the other guess; they are not the same constants
ok
so for g(x)=x+sin(2x) Yp=(Ax+B)+(Csin(2x)+Dsin(2x)) which is just the sum (superposition/linear combination) of our two guesses
since nothing on the right side is a linear combination f anything in the complimentary solution, your solutions are all linearly dependent i.e. we don't need to screw with them any more by adding more x's or anything
linearly independent*
hence the guess for the particular is\[y_p=Ax+B+C\sin(2x)+B\cos(2x)\]the guess for the g(x)=x part+ the guess for the g(x)=sin(2x) part making a little more sense (sorry that I seemed to have discouraged @across from giving her I'm sure much more insightful answer)
I understand it now! Is that it?....or I still gotta solve for A B and C of course
No! That's totally fine. :) I couldn't have said it better.
thanks :) so yeah, now it's business as usual (certainly a bit tedious, but straightforward I think)
A=1
I honestly don't feel like checking your work apart from wolfram, which is not always reliable, but hopefully you will agree.
LOL....Yeah I got this from here on. Thanks Turing!
Thanks to you too @across
so I can skip the annihilator method (I rather avoid it because it looks confusing)
?
it looks like wolfram wants to say A=-1/2 I will play with the system to find the constants, but I'm not going to rush it.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y''%2By'-2y%3Dx%2Bsin(2x)%2C%20y(0)%3D1%2C%20y'(0)%3D0&t=crmtb01 though I really don't trust wolf that much on DE's
Hhmmmm....I'll do it manually too and compare
I worked on understanding this idea for 2 days now...thanks guys for helping me finally understand it, honestly!
That's the best reward I could hope for, happy to help. I'll let you know what I get manually... eventually ;)
No hurry =P
I did get A=-1/2 by hand
actually you can see that fairly quickly...
wanna see how?
sure
I forgot to take the first and second derivative before solving for A B and C...that's why I said A=1 OOOooops
you can also notice that the only part that will have an x left is Yp and since you have -2Yp you will have -2Ax on the left and x on the right hence A=-1/2 the rest is getting a bit frustrating :/
okay I have confirmed wolf's answer on paper
I've gotten A=-1/2 B=-1/4 C=5/2 and D=-5/2
I guess my C's and D's are wrong...oh well I'll take a closer look at wolfram
you wanna walk through it?
Now I got A=-1/2 B=-1/4 C=-1/4 D=1/4 that's before considering y(0)=1 and y'(0)=0
nah, still got problems with C and D can you write out yp, yp', and yp'' ?
\[y_p=Ax+B+Csin2x+Dcos2x\] \[y_p'=A+2Ccos2x-2Dsin2x\] \[y_p''=-4Csin2x-4Dcos2x\]
thanks now just write out the result of doing the sines and cosines in y''+y'-2y ignore the Ax an B as you have already solved it and it won't affect the C and D
\[(-4C-2D-2C)=1\] \[(-4D+2C-2D)=0\]
yep
something is still wrong though
not yet, you just must have messed up solving the system
oh I see what I did
sweet
nope not yet C=3D and then you sub it into the first equation -6(3D)+2D=1 that still is D=-1/16
no it aint :P
you changed a sign
the first equation is -2D, not +2D
that's what I had right? \[(-4C-2D-2C)=1\] \[(-4D+2C-2D)=0\] simplified \[(-6C-2D)=1\] \[(-6D+2C)=0\] multiply the lower equation by 3 \[(-6C-2D)=1\] \[(+6C-18D)=0\] -----------------------+ -20D=1 D=-1/20
yay!
LATEX makes all the difference!
I really think that if programs are meant to do anything tedious in math, systems are about the most perfect example there is although, a few linear algebra tricks can solve these 2x2's pretty darn fast
btw I made the \(exact\) same mistake and got D=1/16 first
the system to find the constants in the particular is actually a bit worse I'd say, so I used some linear algebra stuff there
I mean in the complimentary
Hopefully this summarizes everything that went on in here nicely for you :) https://dl.dropbox.com/u/12189012/OS.pdf
oh my gosh! did you just make that?
I felt like practicing my rusty \(\LaTeX\) skills.
That is quite generous, and looks much nicer than my two pages of scribbles with things crossed out ;)
you are soo sweet! thank you!
OS rocks!
yes it does :)

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question