At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

See more answers at brainly.com

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

To see the **expert** answer you'll need to create a **free** account at **Brainly**

watching :)

hahah ....

me too ... just for the sake of memory :)

Me three!

This is why OS is awesome, they never teach you subs like this in the USA...

this looks promising
\[ x = a \; \sec ^2 t - b\; \tan ^2 t\]

looks like Euler's subs is like Weierstrass subs ... always gives the answer but really last resort.

Can I try the first one?

yep sure ...

pretty cool technique ... i hadn't seen this either.

you see how you change dx?

dx = dt

I get it.

nice use of symmetry on the previous solution BTW

that is just inverse of cosine hyperbolic ...

\[ \cosh^{-1}\left( t \over c \right) = u \]

Ok. But I don't like \(\sinh(2\;\text{arccosh}\; t) \)

i don't like hyperbolic functions either. because they look like circle in complex plane :)

But this will make easier. Euler subs will make the integral too complicated.

yeah ... agree on that point. I don't like Weierstrass subs either.

i would try makings
\[ x = a \; \sec ^2 t - b\; \tan ^2 t \]
haven't thought of second one.

something is really bad with chrome

damn ... lol. Didn't know it would get involved with two elliptical types.