Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

BIGDOG96 Group Title

Which of the following best describes the evolutionary relationship between modern humans and chimpanzees? Answers Humans descended from apes, while chimpanzees evolved from a different, more primitive ancestor. Humans and chimpanzees are both primates that diverged from primitive common ancestors. Humans descended from chimpanzees and therefore have the same evolutionary ancestors. Humans evolved independently of chimpanzees and do not share a common ancestor.

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Calliope Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Here's a handy tree to show you how humans and chimps are related: http://uglicoyote.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/primatephylogeny.jpg

    • 2 years ago
  2. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    the belief is that humans and chimps were from common ancestry... though we both have the same amount of chromosomes.

    • 2 years ago
  3. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    and your picture supports that.

    • 2 years ago
  4. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    according to anthropologists etc.. we all share the same common ancestry way back .. like homo erectus or something.. maybe homo aferensis

    • 2 years ago
  5. Calliope Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I'm pretty sure chimps branched off long before Homo erectus... Basically, around 5-6 million years ago, a population of some sort of (probably) African primate divided into two groups. One of those groups went on to become chimpanzees, and the other group went on to become humans (through a variety of stages, with plenty of smaller populations of human-like animals splitting off at various times and then going extinct.)

    • 2 years ago
  6. BIGDOG96 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The chart doesn't help.

    • 2 years ago
  7. Calliope Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    It should.

    • 2 years ago
  8. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    homo erectus was one of the few i remember from my human origins class :)

    • 2 years ago
  9. BIGDOG96 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm so confused...how do I find the correct answer? Not to be rude.

    • 2 years ago
  10. BIGDOG96 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Is it C?

    • 2 years ago
  11. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    humans did not descend from chimps.

    • 2 years ago
  12. Calliope Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Homo erectus lived a couple of million years ago, I think, and was either directly on the evolutionary line that eventually became humans or was on a side branch off that line. Our ancestors somehow became separated from the ancestors of chimps 5-6 million years ago. Before that, we had a common ancestor.

    • 2 years ago
  13. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if you look at your picture.. you can solve this problem. see the pictures on the top.. lemurs to humans? now look at the paths leading off of the pictures.. this shows where each came from. the numbers on the side are years ago. so.. the longer then number of years ago the less species.. so look at your answers.. which makes sense.. strictly according to the picture?

    • 2 years ago
  14. BIGDOG96 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    B?

    • 2 years ago
  15. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    would be my guess.. my next question is why they chose that naked lady for the human representation. i guess they could have put a loin cloth on her or something.

    • 2 years ago
  16. Calliope Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    They drew all the other animals naked too.

    • 2 years ago
  17. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    lol.. well .. animals dont typically wear clothing :)

    • 2 years ago
  18. BIGDOG96 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    lol

    • 2 years ago
  19. BIGDOG96 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanks guys...sorry I didn't get it.

    • 2 years ago
  20. BIGDOG96 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    At first

    • 2 years ago
  21. Nameless Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    no problem. good luck :)

    • 2 years ago
  22. Calliope Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I think it's just an old tradition... a lot of medical and science books represent generic human beings with either a naked man or a naked woman. Most illustrations of parasite life cycles in my books involve drawings of naked people. Not sure why they do it, but it could be to show the anatomy (e.g. when emphasising the similarities between humans and primates) and/or to avoid clothing being a distraction. Keep in mind how fast fashions change, and how much a person's clothing can say about him/her.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.