Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

TuringTest Group Title

Definite integral\[\int_0^1\frac x{x^3+1}dx\]

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I've had this one on my head for a couple days now, so whoever can help me gets mad respect :)

    • one year ago
  2. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    you can do that using partial fraction. but this is not quite interesting.

    • one year ago
  3. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the solution from PF I got seemed drastically different than wolf's elegant answer, though I could have just been unable to manipulate the algebra.

    • one year ago
  4. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Is PF really the only way I guess is my real question

    • one year ago
  5. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    it seems like there should be a trick

    • one year ago
  6. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah ... very short and elegant method.

    • one year ago
  7. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I know, that is why I want something besides hacking away with PF which gives http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=integral+x%2F%281%2Bx%5E3%29

    • one year ago
  8. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    okay now I see they are the same, so either that was a dumb question, or there is a trick I want to know

    • one year ago
  9. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    there might be.

    • one year ago
  10. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    trig subs might work. but this seems more nasty.

    • one year ago
  11. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Yeah, PF would definitely work. Probably won't be able to do much, but I'll try to poke around and see if I can find a nicer method.

    • one year ago
  12. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Muhahaha

    • one year ago
  13. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ... id have to brute away at it :/

    • one year ago
  14. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    It turns out after researching the integrand for a bit that it has an \(extremely\) nice McLaurin series. I don't have the energy to type out the entire derivation, but you can check it's: \[ \frac{x}{x^3+1}=x-x^4+x^7-x^{10}+...=x\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^nx^{3n} \] Throwing in this in the integral and doing a partial integration we get: \[ \int_0^1{\frac{x}{x^3+1}\, dx}=\int_0^1{x\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^nx^{3n}\,dx} \\ =\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{3n+1}-\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n\int_0^1{x^{3n}\,dx} \\ =\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-1)^n}{3n+1}\left(1-\frac{1}{3n+2}\right) \\ =\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-1)^n}{3n+2} \] Now that sum is a bit harder to calculate, it involves zeta-functions in combination with some subtitutions, but at least it comes out the same as wolf's answer :p

    • one year ago
  15. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    I think it's a more elegant solution, despite it involving some pretty high level stuff.

    • one year ago
  16. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    That was fun, when I first saw that MacLaurin series I got some serious chills down my spine.

    • one year ago
  17. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Oops, typo, the integral term on second line should be: \[ -\sum_{n=0}^\infty{\frac{(-1)^n}{3n+1}}\int_0^1{x^{3n+1}\,dx} \]

    • one year ago
  18. Algebraic! Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    heh, was gonna say, you lost an x!

    • one year ago
  19. Algebraic! Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    then i saw you just forgot it

    • one year ago
  20. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    this seems pretty straight forward \[ \int_0^1{x\sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^nx^{3n}\,dx} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty(-1)^n \int_0^1x^{3n+1}\,dx = \sum_{n=0}^\infty {(-1)^n \over 3n+2}\] I get chills when i see these.

    • one year ago
  21. Algebraic! Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    there's some extra stuff in there...

    • one year ago
  22. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm not quite well with zeta functions ... looks impossible from Fourier series.

    • one year ago
  23. Algebraic! Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    whatever, if it's actually supposed to be there, I can't figure out why..

    • one year ago
  24. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Maybe I forgot something else, did it all on paper and copied it over.

    • one year ago
  25. Algebraic! Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    seems it's just as experimentx did it, what's with the first series and the "(1-"

    • one year ago
  26. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    still ... i never though of this technique. I haven't been using this technique lately. I'll try to think of this way too in the future. gotta sleep ... nearly 3.30 am here.

    • one year ago
  27. Mikael Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    If you've gone McLaurin - then why not go full complex contour integration. The poles are obvious -1, +third-root(-1), -third-root(-1)

    • one year ago
  28. dape Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    Arent the poles \(-1,\sqrt[3]{-1},-(\sqrt[3]{-1})^2\)?

    • one year ago
  29. Dido525 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Isn't this thing just a trig substitution?

    • one year ago
  30. Dido525 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Never mind I see the x cubed. I can't see how to do this without partial fractions :/ .

    • one year ago
  31. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    nice @dape that was definitely more what I was looking for, now this integral is interesting again :)

    • one year ago
  32. Mikael Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yes @dape these are the poles. Yet I am not certain there is an effective choice of contour so that we can find the needed contribution

    • one year ago
  33. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Contour integral are something I certainly learn, but I would then like to see it that way too.

    • one year ago
  34. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    certainly need to*

    • one year ago
  35. Mikael Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1348327205764:dw|

    • one year ago
  36. TuringTest Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Having never taken complex analysis I really don't want to pretend that I understand much about integrating in the complex plane, though of course I understand the concept of writing complex numbers in them and roots of unity... basically.

    • one year ago
  37. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Mikael how to you plan to evaluate that series via contour integrals? Don't you need need to change the series into integral?

    • one year ago
  38. Mikael Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The question - please READ the question of @TuringTest .

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.