Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

chandhuru Group Title

Armstrong number is a number obtained summing the cubes of each number..... consider the number to be abc so took the eqn as 100a + 10b + c = a^3 + b^3 + c^3 how to solve this eqn???

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    There are an infinite number of possible solutions to that equation, but I suspect that's not quite what you're looking for...

    • 2 years ago
  2. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I want to find the solution... in what way can i approach it ??

    • 2 years ago
  3. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Having googled "Armstrong Number", a better way to phrase that question is "An Armstrong number is a 3-digit number such that the sum of the cubes of each of its constituent digits is equal to the number itself. How can I find an armstrong number?"

    • 2 years ago
  4. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Are you trying to find a general expression for all Armstrong numbers, or are you trying to simply find one Armstrong number?

    • 2 years ago
  5. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yaa i know it is a 3 digit number.... i am trying to find the general expression and i want to find the total number of armstrong numbers present.

    • 2 years ago
  6. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I realize that you know the definition. My point was that I did not, so what I said would have been a better way to ask the question in the first place. Incidentally, you are restricting your attention to 3 digit numbers, then? Because the general concept of an Armstrong number can be applied to a number with any number of digits. If you are restricting yourself to 3 digit numbers, I don't think you can express a general relationship between the digits but it would be straightforward to systematically solve for them. There are only a handful.

    • 2 years ago
  7. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    if i can find the solution for this eqn ... then same procedure can be used to find it 4 or 5 or 6 digit number...

    • 2 years ago
  8. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @hartn can u help me ???

    • 2 years ago
  9. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    You're asking for THE solution to an equation with MANY solutions. That is the primary problem here.

    • 2 years ago
  10. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    or at least SEVERAL.

    • 2 years ago
  11. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @hartnn help me ??

    • 2 years ago
  12. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Jemurray3 cant we find that several numbers???

    • 2 years ago
  13. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes, but I'm saying that you'd probably have to do it algorithmically rather than try to find a general expression for the digits. For instance, rearranging the equation, \[100a-a^3 + 10b-b^3 + c-c^3 = 0\] if a = 1 and b = 1, \[99 + 9 = c^2- c \] which doesn't yield an integer c... but going through this process, you might find that 153 works out just fine.

    • 2 years ago
  14. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yaa i found that one... i solve it like |dw:1348380805812:dw| i dont no to proceed further.. if i go by ur method it will be trial and error method.. so i am trying for some different approach.

    • 2 years ago
  15. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    If you code a program you could do it in about ten seconds...

    • 2 years ago
  16. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    lol

    • 2 years ago
  17. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    def Armstrong(): for i in range(1,9): for j in range(0,9): for k in range(0,9): if i*i*i + j*j*j + k*k*k == 100*i + 10*j + k: print(100*i+10*j+k)

    • 2 years ago
  18. Jemurray3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    I'm serious. This is a perfect example of when a computer program would be wonderful. The above code took a little over 10 seconds to write and produced the four 3-digit Armstrong numbers.

    • 2 years ago
  19. chandhuru Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Jemurray3 thank u

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.