At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.
Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus.
Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get our expert's

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions.

See more answers at brainly.com

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your **free** account and access **expert** answers to this and **thousands** of other questions

be more specific

i wish i was good a math

no because for the statement to be true z is a w-group could be true or false

unless there's more to that question...don't you just put a "not" before the adjective?

igbasallote what are you talking about?

I can give you an example to clarify if you want

I was answering ur second question by the way

@lgbasollote was answering your first.

and @lgbasallote you were correct

I don't get what lgbasallote was saying

actually let me look at me logic notes to make sure.

The correct answer to your first question is All cabages are not green

Like the car is red. The negation is the car is not red

why isn't it not all cabbages are green

because that implies that some are green

we want to to do a complete opposite

its confusing I know

so u wan't to tell that none of them are green right?

correct

Did you understand what I was saying to your second question

im trying to figure it out now

What class is this? just curious

advanced mathematics

whole class based on proofs basically

induction proofing, contradictions, and now we are at sets theories

I hate sets

Only class I have ever had to drop cuz i was failing. Sets, relations, and functions.

isn't the negation "all cabbages are not green?"

So @DanielxAK we just had to show that for all to be false one is true?

P-->Q T Premise
Q T Prove

Good catch Daniels

still confused omg

we know that Q is true

so P can be either true of false

P->Q T Premise
Q T Premise
P T Prove
Ok I'm on the right page

So I would say the answer is ~P V P

thats based on truth table on logical implication

I agree

so we can't deduce if P is true

I guess we can't for certain

omg thanks so much for that, I actually get it now

i never heard of this website, but now that i discovered it is so useful and helpful and for free

how do you give a medal?

oo oki got it