Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

xRAWRRx3 Group Title

Solve: -|2m-1| < 2 and please explain how to solve it.

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    |f(x)|<y -> -y < f(x) < y

    • 2 years ago
  2. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    |f(x)| > y -> f(x) > y , f(x) < -y

    • 2 years ago
  3. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    can you do it now ?

    • 2 years ago
  4. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    um, no, I don't get what you mean by all that..

    • 2 years ago
  5. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ok if we divide the equation by -1 what will we get ?

    • 2 years ago
  6. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    well, my teacher said to change the < to a = when I solve these types of problems so i would get: |2m-1| = -2

    • 2 years ago
  7. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ok if you want to do it this way you dont have to divide.. but if you done it already now you know to find m's that satisfy |2m-1| = -2 ?

    • 2 years ago
  8. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    well, to get rid of the absolute values first, I just seperated it into 2m -1 = -2 and 2m -1 = 2 like my teacher told me to and I got the answers -1/2 and 3/2 but when I tried to check it, it doesn't seem right..

    • 2 years ago
  9. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    you have to plug now some m<-1/2 like m = -1 -1/2 < m < 3/2 lke m = 1 and m>3/2 like m = 2 in the original equation and see if it holds

    • 2 years ago
  10. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    when does it hold?

    • 2 years ago
  11. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    are you there?

    • 2 years ago
  12. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yeah sorry, I tried numbers but it didn't work...

    • 2 years ago
  13. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    can someone else tell me how to solve this or if I'm doing something wrong?

    • 2 years ago
  14. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    why? when you plug m=-1 what do you get?

    • 2 years ago
  15. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i get -4 <2

    • 2 years ago
  16. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    so it holds isnt it?

    • 2 years ago
  17. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    -4 is indeed smaller than 2

    • 2 years ago
  18. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes, I know but the answers i got for m and every other number works too which shouldn't be happening

    • 2 years ago
  19. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it works for every m

    • 2 years ago
  20. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it is obvious.. the original question is negative number < 2 so it always holds i wanted to work on the technique with you

    • 2 years ago
  21. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i don't get how that can work though...so the answer is that all numbers work?

    • 2 years ago
  22. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yes it is obvious .. all the negative numbers are smaller than 2

    • 2 years ago
  23. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    if you didnt see it at the original question you could see it when you asked yourself |2m-1| = -2 ? it is never happens .. since left hand side of the equation is always positive !!

    • 2 years ago
  24. xRAWRRx3 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ohhhh, okay, thank you :)

    • 2 years ago
  25. Coolsector Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    yw;)

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.