Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

amistre64 Group Title

Object sliding down a ramp .... PE and KE

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1348751150306:dw|

    • one year ago
  2. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh, and time it takes to slide to the bottom of the ramp is 1.638 seconds Potential energy = .0025*9.8*.46 Kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp is?

    • one year ago
  3. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    this problem involves friction

    • one year ago
  4. imron07 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I think we can use work-kinetic energy theorem.

    • one year ago
  5. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hopefully :) I seem to come up with 2 different answers; and i know one of them is wrong.

    • one year ago
  6. imron07 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The aceleration must be constant right?

    • one year ago
  7. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[a=\frac{2d}{t^2}\] \[v=at=\frac{2d}{t}\] \[K_e=\frac12mv^2\] energy lost to friction \[P_e-K_e\]

    • one year ago
  8. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    assume a constant acceleration yes

    • one year ago
  9. imron07 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    You're did it correct i think

    • one year ago
  10. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    do you know the co-efficient of sliding friction?

    • one year ago
  11. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    not outright; but that can be calculated with given information i believe

    • one year ago
  12. imron07 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Hmm, actually we don't need \(\mu\) since time is known.

    • one year ago
  13. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    mmm true.

    • one year ago
  14. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    \[\mu_k=\frac{g~sin\theta-a}{g~cos\theta}\] \[F_k=\mu_k*\vec n=\frac{g~sin\theta-a}{g~cos\theta}*mg~cos\theta\] \[F_k=m(g~sin\theta-a)\] \[W_f=F_k*d=md~(g~sin\theta-a)\]

    • one year ago
  15. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    hey you know that v=2d/t^2. So KE is just 1/2 mv^2.

    • one year ago
  16. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    i mean, what else do you want?

    • one year ago
  17. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    just working it thru a couple of ways. When I first tried to work this out; I used: Pe = mgh = 0.01127 J in a frictionless system; Ke = Pe at the bottom of the ramp mgh = mv^2/2 gh = v^2/2 sqrt(2gh) = v v = 3.0027 m/s right?

    • one year ago
  18. imron07 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The problem maybe 1.638 sec isn't the correct time :)

    • one year ago
  19. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    yes, v=3m/s in that case.

    • one year ago
  20. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    its pretty good, we slid the penny 5 times and averaged it out

    • one year ago
  21. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    at first the velocity of the Ke i just worked out threw me for a loop

    • one year ago
  22. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    you actually measured 3m/s!?

    • one year ago
  23. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i couldnt see why the velocity from v=2d/t wasnt matching up :)

    • one year ago
  24. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    the 3 m/s was not measured, it was calculated

    • one year ago
  25. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    oh i thought you performed an experiment with a penny..

    • one year ago
  26. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i spose my question is; is using the velocity of 2d/t a proper way to determine the kinetic energy in the system at the bottom of the ramp?

    • one year ago
  27. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    yes. This works no matter what the friction is (even 0).

    • one year ago
  28. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thanks :) so if it was a frictionless system, then the kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp would still equal the potential energy from the start of it; and all that would change is the final velocity of the object then.

    • one year ago
  29. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ..and a change in time, but thats a given :)

    • one year ago
  30. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    yes.

    • one year ago
  31. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    Here's a nice video of an extreme case where the object slides with uniform velocity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84DXjumAxNQ&feature=plcp

    • one year ago
  32. amistre64 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    lol, great; i minute ten watching a sock slide down a banister ....

    • one year ago
  33. rajathsbhat Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 2

    x)

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.