Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

inkyvoyd

A sine wave is shown in the attachment. Approximate the point shown on the graph. The unlabelled x-axis is on the same units as the y.

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    This is a sine wave shifted down 3 units, with an amplitude five times that of the parent function, and a period of 4. Thus the equation of the function is f(x)=5 sin( (pi*x)/4)-3 0=5 sin( (pi*x)/4)-3 Then, the x coordinate is 3/5=sin((pi/4)x) (pi*x)/4=arcsin(3/5) X=(4arcsin(3/5))/pi My work. The last two lines are wrong because of the arcsin. Please explain to me how to determine the second intersection p and not the first intersection.

    • one year ago
    1 Attachment
  2. Algebraic!
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    what did you get for x?

    • one year ago
  3. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Some value that was correct for the first intersection of the function and the x axis. However, I"m looking for point p...

    • one year ago
  4. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I'm really just having trouble understanding how to find each solution in this problem, and not just the 0<x<pi/2 solution that the inverse trig functions yield.

    • one year ago
  5. KingGeorge
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Well, the first solution is basically what you did. To get the next one, you find the x-coordinate for when your function is -3 for the second time. So first, at x=0, f(x)=-3. Second, at x=4, f(x)=-3. Now, you can find the x-coordinate of that first x-intercept with arcsin. Take that value, and call it r. Now, 4-r is the x-coordinate of your second point.

    • one year ago
  6. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So I take advantage of the fact that the sine graph is symmetrical?

    • one year ago
  7. KingGeorge
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Yes.

    • one year ago
  8. KingGeorge
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    That's what I would do in this case anyways. Once you get a more complex graph, I'd have to think about it some more.

    • one year ago
  9. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Uh, what about trig equations?

    • one year ago
  10. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    for 3c I have \(\large \cos^{-1}(\cos(x))=\pi/3\)

    • one year ago
  11. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I mean I'm tempted to just cancel out the functions, but I know that's wrong.

    • one year ago
  12. KingGeorge
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    It's wrong because the functions are periodic. So \[\cos^{-1}(\cos(x))=\cos^{-1}(\cos(x+2\pi))\]So strictly speaking, it's not really an actual inverse.

    • one year ago
  13. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Wait but since we take the arccos second, we can cancel them out right?

    • one year ago
  14. KingGeorge
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    Even then, I don't think you can cancel them unless you're in a very restricted domain.

    • one year ago
  15. inkyvoyd
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I mean, cos always has that range, so the arccos would always yield the defined number that came from cos?

    • one year ago
  16. KingGeorge
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    According to wolfram, that only works for \(-1\le x\le1\)

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.