anonymous
  • anonymous
write M as a product of many factors A and B.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
katieb
  • katieb
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1348860718372:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
i already did it ,but i want to know how to do it with a systematic way,thanks
anonymous
  • anonymous
ABAAB

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

experimentX
  • experimentX
I am not sure but looks worth try.
experimentX
  • experimentX
\[ ABAAB = \begin{bmatrix} 1 &0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \]
anonymous
  • anonymous
Is this matrices??-
anonymous
  • anonymous
yes
anonymous
  • anonymous
A.B.A.A.B=M for sure
experimentX
  • experimentX
hold on ... looks I'm doing wrong calculation with MMA http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i={{1%2C+0}%2C+{1%2C+1}}*{{a%2C+b}%2C+{c%2C+d}}
experimentX
  • experimentX
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i={{1%2C+1}%2C+{0%2C+1}}*{{a%2C+b}%2C+{c%2C+d}} let's begin with the nature of those transformations.
experimentX
  • experimentX
Indeed it workds ...i had been using * where i should have used .
anonymous
  • anonymous
woah
experimentX
  • experimentX
let's begin with the nature of transformation \[ \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \times \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ a+ c & b+d \end{bmatrix} \] and \[ \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \times \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} a +c & b +c\\ c & d \end{bmatrix} \]
experimentX
  • experimentX
woops!! that's b+d
experimentX
  • experimentX
\[ M = \begin{bmatrix} 3 & 4 \\ 3 + 2 & 4+3 \end{bmatrix} \] so you need to preceed the left to right by 1
klimenkov
  • klimenkov
Try to write the expressions for multiplying this matrices from another side.
experimentX
  • experimentX
A adds to the bottom while B adds to top. since 4>3 let's looks for B.A = {{2, 1}, {1, 1}} A.B = {{1, 1}, {1, 2}} so A.B is our choice
experimentX
  • experimentX
add down {{1, 1}, {2, 3}} add up {{3, 4}, {2, 3}} add down {{3, 4}, {5, 7}}
anonymous
  • anonymous
i did it in a similar way but without using equations too
experimentX
  • experimentX
well ... i hope there is better method.
anonymous
  • anonymous
|dw:1348863383528:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
too mantain the first line and add to second i have to multlyby A
anonymous
  • anonymous
A(BA.AB)
anonymous
  • anonymous
multply by right is a linear combinations of rows
experimentX
  • experimentX
well ... i kept fitting up. if you intoduce difference and use that difference to introduce another difference .. then it would be (2d) double step. so keep adding from 1, 1 (no difference) to 1 2 .... until the difference is able to give exact value at top. and use that difference to create double difference at bottom.
anonymous
  • anonymous
that is what i did i find first row
anonymous
  • anonymous
first row is two times row1A+row2B
anonymous
  • anonymous
AB put in first 2row1+row 2
anonymous
  • anonymous
thanks @experimentX
experimentX
  • experimentX
haha .... no probs man!!

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.