PhoenixFire
  • PhoenixFire
Use elementary row operations to find the inverse of \left[\begin{matrix}-2 & -1 & 3 \\ 4 & -2 & 1 \\ 0 & 4 & -2\end{matrix}\right] I know the inverse as I've done it via cofactor and adjugate. And wolframalpha has confirmed the result. But no matter how many times I try with the elementary row operations I can't get it right.
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\qquad\qquad\quad\quad[\textbf A|\textbf I]\]\[\left[\begin{matrix}-2 & -1 & 3 \\ 4 & -2 & 1 \\ 0 & 4 & -2\end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 &0 & 1\end{matrix}\right]\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}-2 & -1 & 3 \\ 0 & -4 & 7 \\ 0 & 4 & -2\end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1 & 0 & 0\\ 2 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 &0 & 1\end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_2\rightarrow R_2+2R_1\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}-2 & -1 & 3 \\ 0 & -4 & 7 \\ 0 & 0& 5 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1 & 0 & 0\\ 2 & 1 & 0 \\ 2 &1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_3\rightarrow R_3+R_2\]

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}2 & 1 & 2 \\ 0 & -4 & 7 \\ 0 & 0& 5 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1 & 1 & 1\\ 2 & 1 & 0 \\ 2 &1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_1\rightarrow -(R_1-R_3)\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}2 & 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 4 & -2 \\ 0 & 0& 5 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1 & 1 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 2 &1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_2\rightarrow -(R_2-R_3)\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}2 & 1 & 2 \\ 0 & 1 & -1/2 \\ 0 & 0& 5 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1 & 1 & 1\\ 0 & 0 & 1/4 \\ 2 &1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_2\rightarrow R_2/4\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}2 & 0& 5/2 \\ 0 & 1 & -1/2 \\ 0 & 0& 5 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1 & 1 & 3/4\\ 0 & 0 & 1/4 \\ 2 &1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_1\rightarrow R_1-R_2\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0& 5/4 \\ 0 & 1 & -1/2 \\ 0 & 0& 5 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1/2 & 1/2 & 3/8\\ 0 & 0 & 1/4 \\ 2 &1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_1\rightarrow R_1/2\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0& 5/4 \\ 0 & 1 & -1/2 \\ 0 & 0& 1 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1/2 & 1/2 & 3/8\\ 0 & 0 & 1/4 \\ 2/5 &1/5 & 1/5 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_3\rightarrow R_3/5\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0& 5/4 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0& 1 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}1/2 & 1/2 & 3/8\\ 1/5 & 1/10 & 7/20 \\ 2/5 &1/5 & 1/5 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_2\rightarrow R_2+R_3/2\]
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0& 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0& 1 \end{matrix}\right|\left.\begin{matrix}0 & 1/4 & 1 /8\\ 1/5 & 1/10 & 7/20 \\ 2/5 &1/5 & 1/5 \end{matrix}\right]\qquad R_1\rightarrow R_1-5 R_3/4\]\[\qquad\qquad[\textbf I |\textbf A^{-1}]\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
wow that is a lot of work^
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
\[\color{gray} {\begin{matrix}0 & & 0 \\ & & \\ & \smile & \end{matrix}} \]
PhoenixFire
  • PhoenixFire
Wow thank you @UnkleRhaukus !! I understand why you make below the diagonal 0, but then you started working on the top triangle. Does the order matter? For example can I make the bottom triangle 0 then work down the diagonal making them 1? Is making the bottom triangle 0 the really only required step to be done first?
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
you can perform any of the allowed row operations at any time and in any order, some ways are certainly quicker than others , im not sure if the steps i used were the simplest, but they did work
PhoenixFire
  • PhoenixFire
Okay, thank you again.
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
http://www.math.odu.edu/~bogacki/cgi-bin/lat.cgi

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.