A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
suneja
 2 years ago
function f & g are both concave fns of a single variable. Neither fn is necessarily differentiable. is the fn defined by h(x)=f(x)+g(x) necessarily concave, necessarily convex or not necessarily either.
suneja
 2 years ago
function f & g are both concave fns of a single variable. Neither fn is necessarily differentiable. is the fn defined by h(x)=f(x)+g(x) necessarily concave, necessarily convex or not necessarily either.

This Question is Closed

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I am thinking it would be "necessarily concave"... what do you think? I am still considering what impact comes from the fact that it says the functions f and g are not necessarily differentiable.

suneja
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0that wer my doubt area is.. cz wen u jst use the fact that f n g are concave u can show h is concave but wat difference does differentiability makes here

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yes... interesting. What would make f not differentiable but still allow it to be considered concave? There is the "easy" definition of concave as U shaped (bowl, open side up). But the definition based on derivatives depends, I would have thought, on the function being differentiable. Maybe you can imagine a nondifferentiable function that still faces upward.... if you can imagine one, then a second similar upward facing function probably (but I hate guessing!!) can just be added to the first one without affecting concavity.

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0certainly if you had f(x) = x^2 and g(x) = 2x^2, adding them to get h(x) = 3x^2 is still concave. (wait, am I totally backwards on concave? an upward parabola is concave up, right? Not convex? It's been awhile since I've done this sort of problem).

suneja
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0ya upward parabola is concave up

suneja
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0concave fns hav minima ie second differenciation is >0

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so, f(x) = x^2 is concave up, but it doesn't demonstrate nondifferentiability. But I brought it up as a simpler example... adding 2 concaveup parabolas results in a 3rd upfacing parabola

suneja
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0v need to prove tis ... how shud i go abt it

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0so, leaving aside the nondifferentiable part for a sec, I'm pretty certain you could prove analytically that for any f(x) and g(x) that are concave up, h(x) is also concave up.

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0do you actually have to prove this? Or just answer? Also, help me on this nondifferentiable idea... what makes something nondifferentiable? Is it that a derivative is undefined, like a section of vertical slope?

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Do you think the madeup function in that diagram is considered concave but not differentiable because of the vertical slope piece in the middle? I don't really know...

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I just looked it up... it doesn't have to be this hard :)

suneja
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0a fn is not differential at "kink" ie corners so it shudnt be diff

suneja
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0dw:1348930186324:dw it wont be diff der

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0an absolute value function is nondifferentiable... f(x) = x is concave up... g(x) = x + 2 is also... is f(x) + g(x) is concave?

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Maybe... it's making my head hurt! with that absolute value example, does that h(x) qualify as concave up? It doesn't have a single minimum point, but the line across the bottom is a minimum area over that range, and the whole function does face up... just not sure about the definition of concave in a situation like this.

suneja
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0see a/c to the dat i hav they hav jst used tha fact dat f n g r concave all i want to knw is wat does tis phrase means " Neither fn is necessarily differentiable

JakeV8
 2 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think it just means that you cannot rely on differentiating the functions as a way of showing that h(x) is concave. You have to be able to realize what adding concave functions does WITHOUT trying to find the derivative of h(x) to answer about its concavity.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.