Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

suneja

  • 2 years ago

function f & g are both concave fns of a single variable. Neither fn is necessarily differentiable. is the fn defined by h(x)=f(x)+g(x) necessarily concave, necessarily convex or not necessarily either.

  • This Question is Closed
  1. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I am thinking it would be "necessarily concave"... what do you think? I am still considering what impact comes from the fact that it says the functions f and g are not necessarily differentiable.

  2. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    that wer my doubt area is.. cz wen u jst use the fact that f n g are concave u can show h is concave but wat difference does differentiability makes here

  3. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes... interesting. What would make f not differentiable but still allow it to be considered concave? There is the "easy" definition of concave as U shaped (bowl, open side up). But the definition based on derivatives depends, I would have thought, on the function being differentiable. Maybe you can imagine a non-differentiable function that still faces upward.... if you can imagine one, then a second similar upward facing function probably (but I hate guessing!!) can just be added to the first one without affecting concavity.

  4. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    certainly if you had f(x) = x^2 and g(x) = 2x^2, adding them to get h(x) = 3x^2 is still concave. (wait, am I totally backwards on concave? an upward parabola is concave up, right? Not convex? It's been awhile since I've done this sort of problem).

  5. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ya upward parabola is concave up

  6. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    concave fns hav minima ie second differenciation is >0

  7. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so, f(x) = x^2 is concave up, but it doesn't demonstrate non-differentiability. But I brought it up as a simpler example... adding 2 concave-up parabolas results in a 3rd up-facing parabola

  8. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    v need to prove tis ... how shud i go abt it

  9. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so, leaving aside the non-differentiable part for a sec, I'm pretty certain you could prove analytically that for any f(x) and g(x) that are concave up, h(x) is also concave up.

  10. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ya.

  11. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    do you actually have to prove this? Or just answer? Also, help me on this non-differentiable idea... what makes something non-differentiable? Is it that a derivative is undefined, like a section of vertical slope?

  12. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1348929716882:dw|

  13. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Do you think the made-up function in that diagram is considered concave but not differentiable because of the vertical slope piece in the middle? I don't really know...

  14. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I just looked it up... it doesn't have to be this hard :)

  15. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    a fn is not differential at "kink" ie corners so it shudnt be diff

  16. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1348930186324:dw| it wont be diff der

  17. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    an absolute value function is non-differentiable... f(x) = |x| is concave up... g(x) = |x + 2| is also... is f(x) + g(x) is concave?

  18. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1348930353864:dw|

  19. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    k tis makes sense:)

  20. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Maybe... it's making my head hurt! with that absolute value example, does that h(x) qualify as concave up? It doesn't have a single minimum point, but the line across the bottom is a minimum area over that range, and the whole function does face up... just not sure about the definition of concave in a situation like this.

  21. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    see a/c to the dat i hav they hav jst used tha fact dat f n g r concave all i want to knw is wat does tis phrase means " Neither fn is necessarily differentiable

  22. JakeV8
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I think it just means that you cannot rely on differentiating the functions as a way of showing that h(x) is concave. You have to be able to realize what adding concave functions does WITHOUT trying to find the derivative of h(x) to answer about its concavity.

  23. suneja
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    maybe

  24. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.