A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
myininaya
 3 years ago
True/False: A graph that contains just a single point (h,k) can be written as (xh)^2+(yk)^2=0 which means it can be seen as a circle with radius 0.
Please state what you think. Don't look it up on a website because I can do that if that is what I wanted. :)
myininaya
 3 years ago
True/False: A graph that contains just a single point (h,k) can be written as (xh)^2+(yk)^2=0 which means it can be seen as a circle with radius 0. Please state what you think. Don't look it up on a website because I can do that if that is what I wanted. :)

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Its true...i didnt look it up

myininaya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0That is what I say to but people actually do take the other side on this one. If there is any reason why you think it is true, can you say why?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0that is the formula for it , look in your book

experimentX
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2the equality only hold for (x,y) = (h,k) for any set of point other than (h, k) this relation is not valid in Real plane.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@experimentX its the formula for it man

experimentX
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2formula is just expression of logic.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Some people don't like the idea of calling something with zero size a circle (or any other plane figure), but I don't have a problem with it. If you want to be more precise, it's the limit of a circle as its radius approaches zero.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0That is the standard form of an equation for a circle with r=0, so why not? I would be more general and say it's an ellipse of size zero, but I'm a dork like that.

myininaya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I think it depends on how you define a circle. I would say the radius could be greater than equal to 0. Someone told me you can actually prove that when you have (xh)^2+(yk)^2=0 this is a circle.

myininaya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I left out the word "or"

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Depends on if you want a synthetic geometry definition, analytic geometry definition, calculus definition. As far as I'm concerned, It is a circle. It's a circle with r=0.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So, in more plain language (or using a geometry definition), it would be better to call it a point rather than a circle, but as long as you are clear in your definitions and can show your logic is consistent in either case, either way works.

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2if you let r=0 then you will destroy properties that all 'normal' circles have

myininaya
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0You put quotation marks around normal because you do see it as a circle @zarkon , but not a "normal" circle ?

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2I would call it a degenerate circle

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0It's a shorter way of saying "circle with radius zero."

experimentX
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2perhaps that way we could avoid confusing the difference between these two. (xh)^2+(yk)^2=0 a(xh)^2+b(yk)^2=0

precal
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0but isn't a circle just defined as a center with all points on the circumference equadistant fro the center. Hmmmmm center and circumference are the same here.......

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I don't see why the center and circumference cannot coincide. There is nothing in the definition of a circle that forbids that.

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2that depends on what definition you use

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2I like my circles to have interiors..and the break the plane into two regions (not including the circle itself)

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2that way all my theorems hold and make sense

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Maybe thinking of the equation as a "circle" is what makes it seem confusing. Think of it as a distance function:\[d: \mathbb{R}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\]\[((x_1,y_1),(x_2,y_2))\longmapsto \sqrt{(x_1x_2)^2+(y_1y_2)^2}\]

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Then in a sense, when you have:\[(xh)^2+(yk)^2=0\]you are saying "I want the set of all points (x,y) such that the distance between (x,y) and (h,k) is zero."

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@joemath314159 the equation of a circle, the distance formula, and the pythagorean theorem are all the same thing.

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2draw a tangent to a circle with radius zero

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0@Zarkon why does a tangent need to be defined in order for it to be a circle?

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2all other circles have that property..and many other properties that are destroyed by having r=0...maybe it should have its own name...like "point"

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0And even if there is no single unique tangent to that point, a tangent can still be drawn.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Those are properties of some circles, but are they included in the definition of "circle?"

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Argument from personal preference isn't valid, I'd think.

Zarkon
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.2most are theorems that require that a circle have an interior

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Then that's just too bad. You use those theorems when they apply. If they don't apply, you don't use the theorems. Whether or not particular theorems apply does not change the definition of "circle."
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.