hana88
  • hana88
if x is an integer divisible by 3, then x^2 is divisible by 3. is this true or false? is the converse true or false?
Mathematics
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Get this expert

answer on brainly

SEE EXPERT ANSWER

Get your free account and access expert answers to this
and thousands of other questions

hana88
  • hana88
can any one help?
anonymous
  • anonymous
x = N x 3, represents the divisible by 3 integer. x^2 then equals N^2 x 3^2 which having the factors of 3 is therefore divisible by 3. Is this useful?
hana88
  • hana88
yes thank you

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

hana88
  • hana88
what about the converse?
lopus
  • lopus
X=2*3 6/3=2 \[x^{2}=36\] 36/3=12
hana88
  • hana88
that only gives me evidence
anonymous
  • anonymous
I haven't done this stuff in awhile. Do you mean if and integer, x, is divisible by 2 then x^3 is also divisible by 2?
hana88
  • hana88
no if x^2 is divisive by 3, then x is divisible by 3
anonymous
  • anonymous
OK. I am winging it here In order for x^2 to be divisible by a prime, which cannot be further factored then it must also be a factor of x. Is this useful?
lopus
  • lopus
x=n*3 n=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8............... x^2=3,36,81,144....... divide
hana88
  • hana88
@lopus x is 3,6,9,12,18...
anonymous
  • anonymous
x = 3,6,9,... is correct valus for x but does that indicate that if x^2 is divisible by 3 then so is x? I am asking because I don't know. A question about the question.
lopus
  • lopus
yes, you just divide and see for yourself demostration x=N*3 (N*3)^2 =n^2 * 3^3
lopus
  • lopus
excuse me 3^2
anonymous
  • anonymous
So you don't really need the series you just need if x^2 is divisible by 3 then x is because 3 cannot be further factored. And the equations you provided apply in bothe directions. unlike say if x^2 is divisible by 4 then x is not necessarily divisible by for because 4 can be further factored, i.e., 2^2 = 4 is divisible by 4 but x, being 2, is not. Yes?
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
If x^2 is divisible by 3 it can be written in the form 3a where a is an integer. So x^2=3a and x = sqrt3(sqrt a) so the converse is not true.
helder_edwin
  • helder_edwin
3 is a prime number. u should pay attention to that!!!
hana88
  • hana88
um @helder you make no sense
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
Why?
hana88
  • hana88
@Mertsj thanks thats the best answer because it was easy to understand
helder_edwin
  • helder_edwin
if \(3\mid x^2\) then \(3\mid x\) because 3 is prime.
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
yw
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
That is not true helder. 3|15 but 3 does not divide sqrt15
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
So if x^2 = 15, 3 is a factor of x^2 but not a factor of x
helder_edwin
  • helder_edwin
but 15 is not a perfect square!
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
The converse is: If x^2 is divisible by 3 then x is an integer divisible by 3. So we see that x^2 does not have to be a perfect square. It only has to be divisible by 3.
helder_edwin
  • helder_edwin
so why it is x^2 if it is not a perfect square?
Mertsj
  • Mertsj
x^2 could be 15 or 18 or 21 or 24 or 27 or 12 .
helder_edwin
  • helder_edwin
nerver mind.
anonymous
  • anonymous
If x^2 does not have to be a perfect square then the converse is not true. However, if x^2 is perfect and divisible by 3 then is the converse true? And would that be the case for any prime? Since primes cannot be factored into smaller integers then I think in order for the square to be factorable by the prime then you must have the prime^2 in order to have the prime as a factor of x^2.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.