A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
NotTim
 4 years ago
Simple practical application (no math): A child is standing on a slowly rotating ride in a park. the ride operator makes the statement that in Earth's frame of reference, the child remains at the same distance from the centre of the ride because there is no net force acting on him. Do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
NotTim
 4 years ago
Simple practical application (no math): A child is standing on a slowly rotating ride in a park. the ride operator makes the statement that in Earth's frame of reference, the child remains at the same distance from the centre of the ride because there is no net force acting on him. Do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.

This Question is Closed

NotTim
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1MY ANSWER: Yes, I agree with this statement because the child maintains a constant radius throughout the ride. @ every point on the ride, there is the same gravitational force and centripetal force throughout

NotTim
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I'm sorry but that is NOT a viable option.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0da fuk is Earth's frame of reference?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0post it on yahooanswers

NotTim
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1lol like i trust yahoo answers.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hey mang, it's better than nothing

NotTim
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1I'm going to sleep. If anyone responds. I'll be back.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I disagree. In the Earth's frame the child is moving in a circle. Since his velocity vector is constantly changing, his acceleration is NOT zero, thus there must be a net force acting on him.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0The net force acting on him is the centripetal force. It is the force that causes him to move in a circle. If there were no net force acting on him, he would continue to move in a straight line at content speed.

NotTim
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1But relative to the earth's frame of reference?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0My answer is relative to the Earth's frame.

NotTim
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1so, really, the only reason why the child remains the same distance from the centre of the ride is because of the constant radiu, and not the force?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Your answer states that you agree because there is the same net gravitational and centripetal force throughout the motion. It is true that the net forces are constant throughout the motion. The ride operator argues that there is NO net force on the kid. Obviously this is not correct, the kid isn't moving in a straight line at constant speed (Newton's first law).

NotTim
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1so, the correct answer is that although the child remains the same distance from the centre, their still is a net force acting upon him?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0the centripetal force is what keeps the kid at a constant distance from the center of the circle. If the centripetal force changed, the radius would change. In the extreme case, where the centripital force vanishes, the kid would fly off in straight line, away from the centre of the circle. dw:1349029423494:dw

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0That's absolutely correct

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Technically the centripetal force isn't constant. It has a constant magnitude, but the direction of the force is always changing (it is always pointing to the center of the circle as the kid moves around). The direction of the force is changing so it isn't a "constant" force.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0no problem. I hope this makes sense. Basically, the only time there is no NET force on an object is when the object moves in a straight line at constant speed. If either the speed or the direction of motion are not constant, there MUST be a NET force.
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.