A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 3 years ago
numerical analysis
Bairstow method
why the first initial guess doesn't lead us to answer always ???
anonymous
 3 years ago
numerical analysis Bairstow method why the first initial guess doesn't lead us to answer always ???

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0which we use for finding all roots of a polynomial...help would be appreciated

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0how our initial guess increases the rate of convergence

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ok I will have to read more and think. Basically there should be a procedure that deals with quadratic root troubles. Initial guess is small change , forget it. I have some idea but have to test it. Imagine that qudr. root is NOT quadratic root. How ? Several ways are possible  you invent, and I invent....

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0thank u...i'll check this :)

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Wait, @mukushla I think I might know.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Bairstow's method relies on newton's method to calculate the quadratic's coeffs, right?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yeah we extract quadratics from a polynomial and then solve for all of its roots...

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0But newton's method essentially makes the assumption that \[\Delta y = \Delta x dy\]

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So if I have some function where the tangent line (dy/dx) has a slope negative to the actual secant line (delta y/delta x) that it's approximating, then you'll get farther from where you started.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Ex:dw:1349025207545:dw

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0that makes sense ... lets say\[a_nx^n+....+a_1x+a_0=(b_{n2}x^{n2}+....+b_1x+b_0)(x^2rxs)+b_{1}(xr)+b_{2}\]my initial guess will be \((r_1,s_1)\); how u explain it for this...

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i mean how u say relies on newton's method ??

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well, if you were using Bairstow's method normally, how would you find r and s?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0starting with an initial guess and modify it \[r_2=r_1+\Delta r\]\[s_2=s_1+\Delta s\]

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Yes, how do you get delta r and delta s?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0system of equations which comes from \[b_{1}(r+\Delta r,s+\Delta s)=0\]\[b_{2}(r+\Delta r,s+\Delta s)=0\]

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yes, so if that system of equations happens to give you, for example, \(\Delta r = 0\) and \(\Delta s = 0\)?

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0then i cant modify my r and s

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Exactly, and you're stuck in an infinite loop.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0sorry man...just one more question...under what conditions we get delta r and delta s =0

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well, that's dependent on the actual polynomial and the r_1 and s_1 that you choose.

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Specifically, this occurs when \(s=h/g\) and \(r=\frac{g}{hg}\) Where g and h are the remainder coefficients after two divisions: \[a_nx^n+....+a_1x+a_0=\]\[(b_{n2}x^{n2}+....+b_1x+b_0)(x^2rxs)+ix+j=\]\[(c_{n4}x^{n4}...+ c_0)(x^2rxs)+gx+h\]

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I have to cite Wikipedia for the conditions in the last part though: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/0/6/b/06bed931e9c9f2a198dc0b053f5fd43b.png

anonymous
 3 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0thank u very much @vf321 ... i really appreciate your help :)
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.