At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
are u sure about n=7, r= 0 ?
out of 7, any'one' has done a one.... so do u feel r should be 1 ?
the probability of success = probability of flinging = p = 10% = 0.1 \(\checkmark\) the probability of failure = probability of not flinging = q = 90% = 0.9 \(\checkmark\)
just clear your confusion about, n and r
oh sorry I was gone for while. Let's see here. Give me a second to read everything. Sorry :S
Ok so about n and r. #number of trials How do I relate that to this problem? I guessed that n=7 because it looked nice, but I don't have a good explanation for why I picked it
I meant n=# of trials
number of trials or events or no. of creatures/people on which experiment is performed = n =7 here, \(\checkmark\)
r is the number of people 'chosen' here probability that anyONE has done fling implies, r=1 make sense? or more explanation?
so when we say r=0...
almost never.....when we don't perform experiment.....maybe there are some special case for this
make sure u understand why n=7, r=1 here
When no one has done a fling wouldn't that be r=0?
umm, yes i think so....(0.9)^7 seems right
a) No one has done a one-time fling? r=0 b) At least one person r=1 c.) No more than two people \[r \ge 2\] That's how I calculated it, whatcha think?
b)P( atleast 1 person) =1-P (no one )
no more = less r<=2
oh yes. sorry.
exactly 1---->r=1 atleast 1 = 1- none
atmost 1 --> r<=1
make sense ?
Yes, I think so.
Can I show you what I did for another problem. I think my thought process is right. Feel free to point out any errors.
i will. yes show
Trevor is interested in purchasing the local hardware/sporting goods store in the small town of Dove Creek, Montana. After examining accounting records for the past several years, he found that the store has been grossing over $850 per day about 60% of the business days it is open. Estimate the probability that the store will gross over $850 (a) at least 3 out of 5 business days. (b) at least 6 out of 10 business days. (c) fewer than 5 out of 10 business days. p=.60 q=.40 a.) n=5 because "number of trials or events or no. of creatures/people on which experiment is performed " => In this case we have a total number of 5 days (events/trials) at least 3 out of 5 would mean: r>=3 To calculate this I would do P[r=3]+P[r=4]+P[r=5] b.) n=10 r>=6 To calculate.... P[r=6]+P[r=7]+P[r=8]+P[r=9]+P[r=10]
and did u get correct answer for the problem posted ? n=7,r=1,p=0.1,q=0.9
and for (c) n=10 r<5
all n, r selections \(\huge \checkmark\)
Yaaay!!!!! For the first problem I got a.) 0.478 b.) 0.522 c.) 0.974
sorry, i didn't do calculation part, i thought u had answers to verify, method is correct
I did have the answers =)
Thank you once again my friend!
so did they match? welcome ^_^