anonymous
  • anonymous
I was thinking about gravity. Can anyone help me find what is mistake in my new idea?
Physics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
jamiebookeater
  • jamiebookeater
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Noone here to help me?
theEric
  • theEric
I'm no expert, but I could try to lend a hand briefly!
theEric
  • theEric
Good luck!

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I am thinking attractive force in nature is caused by only one way......... I mean in electromagnetism attractive force is caused by charges and in newtons gravity theory attractive force is caused by masses....... even-though the magnitude is different the qualitative property of attraction is same in both.....so, I am just wandering if there is same thing behind of attraction whether it's electron-proton or earth-sun
anonymous
  • anonymous
Am I just wasting my time or that makes some sense?
theEric
  • theEric
Thinking is not wasting time!
anonymous
  • anonymous
i guess google can answer that for you according to what i read just now ,try searching
theEric
  • theEric
It is common to like electromagnetism and gravitation! Have you seen their equations?
anonymous
  • anonymous
you mean inverse square laws?
anonymous
  • anonymous
@abhishekjais can you please send me link?
theEric
  • theEric
In fact, static electric force has the same property. I believe, though I'm tired and my memory isn't great, that the equations all look like\[F=C_{constant}\frac{p_{1, someProperty}-p_{2, someProperty}}{d_{distanceApart}^2}\]
anonymous
  • anonymous
why does mass attract other mass <------- this is the question you should search ; there are more that one topics which might be worth reading for you
theEric
  • theEric
Albert Einstein, among many other physicists, have been contemplating the possiblility of a "unified filed theory" to explain this pattern.
theEric
  • theEric
Internet is a great source!
theEric
  • theEric
You can also search for information about the other field forces, unless this will hurt your focus on gravity.
theEric
  • theEric
The properties in the numerators of the equations are like: electric: charge gravitational: mass
anonymous
  • anonymous
you may like to read how Einstein interpretted gravity in terms of space fabric if you are curious
theEric
  • theEric
And I'm not sure if/how magnetism fits in. I know that current theory places electrons as the source of magnetism, direction is decided by they're "spin". And if two charges interact through magnetism, they are moving relative to each other.
theEric
  • theEric
Oh, there are some good youtube videos that try to explain Einstein's theories! Good luck!
theEric
  • theEric
Also note that Einstein did not discover any unified field theory, and some physicists disagree with Einstein's approach. I wish I could remember the one physicist's name... Sorry I can't!
theEric
  • theEric
I read that Einstein based some of his theories of of someone else's work, and then sort of took a tangent, but that was the opinion of this physicist I can't remember.
anonymous
  • anonymous
your new idea? *w*
anonymous
  • anonymous
@rainbowink I don't know if someone already tought about that........it's new for me
anonymous
  • anonymous
*thought"

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.