Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

Cat1950 Group Title

How were atomic models developed when no one had seen an atom?

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. HELLSGUARDIAN Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    there were experiments done by various scientists for example goldfoil experiment by ernst rutherford gave rotherford model..and many more..

    • 2 years ago
  2. JFraser Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    look up the following atomic models: thomson's plum pudding rutherford's gold foil bohr's energy levels the results of these experiments allowed us to change the model we use to visualize what an atom might look like, even if we've never actually seen one

    • 2 years ago
  3. Carl_Pham Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    The first and most important clue to the existence of atoms was chemistry -- the Rules of Constant and Multiple Proportions. It's very hard to explain why water ALWAYS consists of 9 parts (by mass) oxygen to 1 part hydrogen -- unless there is some fundamental "unit" of water that is made from "units" of oxygen and hydrogen. What other way could there be to have exactly and precisely the same recipe followed every time? If the amount of a substance were not quantized -- came in any size chunk you wanted, no matter how large or small -- then why wouldn't water sometimes be 9.0002 parts oxygen to 1 part hydrogen, or 8.884 to 1, or anything in between? So there is good evidence for atoms just from the nature of chemistry, and this is why organic chemists accepted the existence of atoms in the 19th century, long before there was any direct evidence at all. The next important piece of evidence was the gas laws. Why does a gas exert a pressure, an why does it increase with temperature the way it does? This is very easy to explain if you think the gas is made of little balls bouncing around mostly empty space -- that is, the gas is made of atoms. It's very hard to explain if a gas is made of some continuous but low-density stuff, like very light foam. Why would it exert a pressure? Why would the pressure change with temperature the way it does? So experiments with gases also gave evidence for atoms, although understanding the gas laws (which happened in the 17th and 18th centuries) had to wait a while, before the math and physics for dealing with bouncing balls caught up to observation. Another good piece of evidence was Brownian motion: the obsevation under a microscope that tiny bits of flotsam in water will jiggle around randomly. Why does this happen? Again, it's easy to explain if the water is made of atoms in motion, for they will bombard the stuff unevenly, from moment to moment, like a crowd jostling someone walking through it, and hence it will jiggle randomly. But how can this happen, if the water is not made of atoms? The final proof of atoms is probably the fact that they were directly imaged by, e.g. STMs in the 1990s. But there was lots of indiret proof before that.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.