Ace school

with brainly

  • Get help from millions of students
  • Learn from experts with step-by-step explanations
  • Level-up by helping others

A community for students.

Express the inverse of the following matrix (assuming it exists) as a matrix containing expressions in terms of k. -3 0 k 12 8 16 4 2 4

Mathematics
See more answers at brainly.com
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.

Join Brainly to access

this expert answer

SIGN UP FOR FREE
um you gave a list of numbers that in no way resembles a matrix
\[\left[\begin{matrix}3 & 0 & k \\ 12 & 8 & 16\\ 4 & 2 & 4\end{matrix}\right]^{-1}\]
can you reduce it to I?

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question

Other answers:

i think so
i write where i am write now
k brb wife just got home.
this is just the coefficient matrix\[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 2\\ 0 & 0 & k\end{matrix}\right]\]
Use Gauss-Jordan elimination on \[\left[\begin{matrix}3 & 0 & k & 1 & 0 & 0\\ 12 & 8 & 16 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 4 & 2 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 1\end{matrix}\right]\] That's how I do it. (There's probably an easier way..)
yes i started w/ that
Hmm, is that 3 in a_11 positive or negative?
this is where im at now\[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{ -1 }{ 4} & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 & 0 & \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } & \frac{ -3 }{ 2 } \\ 0 & 0 & k & 1 & \frac{ -3 }{ 4 } & 3\end{matrix}\right]\]
postive
how would i express k on the inverse matrix
Continue to reduce it using row operations until you have only the identity matrix on the left.
could i multiplay R3 by 1/k?
multiply*
Looks like you have to.
thanks
The last step ought to be subtracting your new R3 from R2.
*Sorry, twice R3 from R2..

Not the answer you are looking for?

Search for more explanations.

Ask your own question