anonymous
  • anonymous
Probability question challenge. Two players roll an \(n\)-sided dice. The player who fails to get better rolls than previous ones loses. How likely is it for the first player to win?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
@UnkleRhaukus @TuringTest @KingGeorge @experimentX @estudier
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
I am terrible at probability, but everyone always asks me about it.
TuringTest
  • TuringTest
I'll be curious to hear what others say though

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
So am I. Took me like 3 days to solve this. But I do have the solution.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I think this is geometric distribution?
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well, no I don't think so.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@Mariantheduke You might be interested. This problem came from the physics dept.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@mukushla
anonymous
  • anonymous
I do not think this solution works.
anonymous
  • anonymous
1/n * (n)/n + 1/n *(n-1)/n + 1/n * (n-2)/n+...
anonymous
  • anonymous
1/n^2 (n+n-1+n-2+n-3+...n-n)
anonymous
  • anonymous
on the right track, but not it.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Did I missed something?
anonymous
  • anonymous
The answer is\[\left(1-\frac1n\right)^{n-r}\]where \(r\) is the roll that has just occurred, and \(n\) the number of sides the dice has.
anonymous
  • anonymous
@saifoo.khan This would interest you, methinks.
anonymous
  • anonymous
I'm sorry, that's the probability for the first player to lose. Wait a second.
anonymous
  • anonymous
The probability that the first player wins is\[1-\left(1-\frac1n\right)^n\]where \(r=0\).
anonymous
  • anonymous
I got |dw:1349578761373:dw|
anonymous
  • anonymous
I have it in good confidence that my answer is correct. I don't know what assumption you made that was wrong, though.
anonymous
  • anonymous
What is r ?
anonymous
  • anonymous
The roll just made.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Well, goodnight, Sir. I will see you another day perhaps.
anonymous
  • anonymous
WELL GOOD NIGHT
saifoo.khan
  • saifoo.khan
@badreferences : No man! I can't do probability. :S
anonymous
  • anonymous
when n=1 and n=2 your and my answer gives the same result Now, when n=3 according to u the answer is 0.7037 and according to me the answer is 0.66666 Now, when n=3 we can do it in a simple way. 1/3 *1 + 1/3 *2/3 + 1/3 *1/3 = 0.66666
anonymous
  • anonymous
If you know r, then its a conditional probability. the actual question was what was the overall probability of the first player winning (regardless of his roll)
anonymous
  • anonymous
@gregohb That sets \(r=0\).
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
each player rolles the same dice with expectation value \(\langle roll\rangle\) the players are expected to roll the same number there will be variation in the result , hence player one will win half of these and play two will win the other half , occasionally the players will roll the same number and in this event play one wins, so if they play for a long time player one is more likely to win
anonymous
  • anonymous
There is something wrong with the original problem. If they roll one each, and stop, and first guys loses. Thats one thing. Or if they keep rolling until one loses, what if they both lose simultaneously. Or what if they keep rolling over and over again and each one wins some and loses some? Then do they keep count? Its not clear. The prob of one guy losing on his own from one roll to the next is (1/n)*(0 + 1/n + 2/n + ... (n-1)/n) = (n-1)*n/(2n^2) = (n-1)/(2n) = a The probablity of the other guy to not lose is 1-a. So For 1st guy to lose and second guy to win (since these are indepedendent events) is a*(1-a). Now if there is a series of rolls and first must continue to lose and 2nd guy continue to win, or whatever, then that needs to be expanded. but i am not clear what the problem is actually asking precisely.

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.