Got Homework?
Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
PhoenixFire
Group Title
Prove by induction that \[(A_1A_2...A_n)^{1}={A_n}^{1}...{A_2}^{1}{A_1}^{1} \]\[\forall n\in \mathbb{N}\] and A_i for i=1, 2, ... are invertible matrices of same dimensions
 2 years ago
 2 years ago
PhoenixFire Group Title
Prove by induction that \[(A_1A_2...A_n)^{1}={A_n}^{1}...{A_2}^{1}{A_1}^{1} \]\[\forall n\in \mathbb{N}\] and A_i for i=1, 2, ... are invertible matrices of same dimensions
 2 years ago
 2 years ago

This Question is Closed

PhoenixFire Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Base step: Let n=1 \[(A_1)^{1}=A_1^{1}\]\[A_1^{1}=A_1^{1}\] Inductive Hyp. : Assume the statement holds true for n=m for some m in Natural Numbers. Inductive Step: Let n=m+1\[(A_1A_2...A_mA_{m+1})^{1}=A_{m+1}^{1}A_m^{1}...A_2^{1}A_1^{1}\]\[(A_1A_2...A_mA_{m+1})^{1}=A_{m+1}^{1}(A_1A_2...A_m)^{1}\] That's about as far as I got. Something doesn't seem right, and the Inductive Step isn't making sense as I don't know how to continue.
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
write dw:1349805212895:dw
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
dw:1349805366358:dw
 2 years ago

asnaseer Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
I would first show that: \((A_1A_2)^{1}=A_2^{1}A_1^{1}\) Then I would assume it is true for n=k., i.e.: \((A_1A_2...A_k)^{1}=A_k^{1}..A_2^{1}A_1^{1}\) And finally I would show that this also leads to: \((A_1A_2...A_k A_{k+1})^{1}=A_{k+1}^{1}A_k^{1}..A_2^{1}A_1^{1}\)
 2 years ago

asnaseer Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
For the final step, you can use the hints given to you by @experimentX
 2 years ago

asnaseer Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
Please let me know if you require any further explanation.
 2 years ago

PhoenixFire Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
I will attempt this in a few hours again... I have to go into Uni right now.
 2 years ago

asnaseer Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
ok  good luck! :)
 2 years ago

PhoenixFire Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Okay I have 2 questions now. 1) Could I not state that from my Inductive Hypothesis (the statement is true for n=k) and let \[B_1=(A_1A_2...A_k)\]\[B_2=A_{k+1}\] and then show: \[(A_1A_2..A_nA_{n+1})^{1}=B_2^{1}B_1^{1}\] From Ind. Hyp. with an n=2 \[(A_1A_2..A_nA_{n+1})^{1}=(B_1B_2)^{1}\]And then substitute in B1 and B2 again to result in an equality of Left hand side and Right hand side? 2) If I choose my base step as n=2 and want to prove \[(A_1A_2)^{1}=A_2^{1}A_1^{1}\]Could I use a direct proof: Multiply both sides by A1A2\[(A_1A_2)^{1}A_1A_2=A_2^{1}A_1^{1}A_1A_2\]\[I=A_2^{1}A_2\]\[I=I\]Proving it for n=2. Am I correct to do it in this way?
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
yeah you are correct ... you can use this law to show for n=3,4,... up to n
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
for the last step, assume it to be true upto n, show that it is true for n+1 then this must be true for any n inductively.
 2 years ago

PhoenixFire Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Excellent. I understand it now. Out of curiosity, is my direct proof also valid?
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
from this particular point, it's correct ... for n=2 2) If I choose my base step as n=2 and want to prove 
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
now show it for n=3 and n=4
 2 years ago

PhoenixFire Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Well for 3 and 4 I'd use pretty much the same direct proof to reduce it to an Identity on both side proving an equality.
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
yes you can do that ... let it assume to be true for some n. then show it to be true for n+1 ..... you can do this by assuming \( A_1 A_2 ...A_n = A\) so that \( A_1 A_2 ...A_n A_{n+1} = A\times A_{n+1}\) Now we assume \( (A_1 A_2 ...A_n)^{1} = A_n^{1} ...A_2^{1}A_1^{1} \) we show that \( (A_1 A_2 ...A_nA_{n+1})^{1} = A_{n_+1}^{1}A_n^{1} ...A_2^{1}A_1^{1} \)
 2 years ago

experimentX Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1
doing that will make your matrix simple product of two matrices. use the simple trick and assumption to show that property.
 2 years ago

PhoenixFire Group TitleBest ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0
Great! Thank you for your help!
 2 years ago
See more questions >>>
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.