Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

sauravshakya Group Title

3^(2p) + 3^(3q) + 3^(5r) = 3^(7s) Find the minimum value of p+q+r+s where p,q,r,s are all positive integer.

  • one year ago
  • one year ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    9^p+27^q+3^5r=3^7s

    • one year ago
  2. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok

    • one year ago
  3. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    got it @sauravshakya

    • one year ago
  4. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    What was that?

    • one year ago
  5. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    we just square and cube the value

    • one year ago
  6. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The question is to find minimum value of p+q+r+s

    • one year ago
  7. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    then common 3 as a base

    • one year ago
  8. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and then add powers

    • one year ago
  9. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    then you solve it

    • one year ago
  10. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I have never seen that rule.

    • one year ago
  11. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok so go through wolframalpha

    • one year ago
  12. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I dont think that will also help here.

    • one year ago
  13. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    go through

    • one year ago
  14. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    There is nothing.

    • one year ago
  15. Zekarias Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I am seeing it.

    • one year ago
  16. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So, what is the answer?

    • one year ago
  17. Zekarias Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Give a min, but at tell u the answer can't be find the above way.

    • one year ago
  18. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    What I figured out till now is s must be an odd number....

    • one year ago
  19. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @experimentX PLZ see this

    • one year ago
  20. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    this doesn't look nice ... saying that find the minimum value of p+q+r+s <--- this should be close to first instances.

    • one year ago
  21. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Cant we find that......

    • one year ago
  22. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    exponential diophantine equations are awful!! you should probably tag mukushla

    • one year ago
  23. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    This question is not of mine........ Someone posted this today and said a 8th grade challenging question.

    • one year ago
  24. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    But he is not online.

    • one year ago
  25. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @mukushla

    • one year ago
  26. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    you don't do diophantine equations on 8th grade.

    • one year ago
  27. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Even I dont know that.

    • one year ago
  28. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    This surely cant be a 8th grade question.

    • one year ago
  29. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @mathslover i think he do this

    • one year ago
  30. mayankdevnani Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    very dhinchach question

    • one year ago
  31. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Now, what I am trying to PROVE is 3^(2p) + 3^(3q) + 3^(5r) = 3^(7s) is never true for any value of p,q,r,s

    • one year ago
  32. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    anyway this was the output I got from mathematica \[ \left\{\left\{p\to \frac{8}{5}+2 i,q\to \frac{223}{10}+\frac{53 i}{5},r\to -\frac{71}{10}-\frac{49 i}{10},\\ s\to \frac{180 i \pi +\text{Log}\left[3^{-\frac{71}{2}-\frac{49 i}{2}}+3^{\frac{16}{5}+4 i}+3^{\frac{669}{10}+\frac{159 i}{5}}\right]}{7 \text{Log}[3]}\right\}\right\} \] I trolled enough ... not time to go strolling!!

    • one year ago
  33. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I dont know it even has a solution.

    • one year ago
  34. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    *now .. seeya later!!

    • one year ago
  35. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok...... BYE thanx for trying.

    • one year ago
  36. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    call it hardly a try .. hehehe

    • one year ago
  37. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    how about this : i dont know if this'll work : ( 3^(2p) + 3^(3q) + 3^(5r) )/3 >= 3^( (2p + 3q + 5r)/3 ) or 3^(7s-1) >= 3^( (2p + 3q + 5r)/3 ) ??

    • one year ago
  38. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @ujjwal p,q,r,s are only positive integers..

    • one year ago
  39. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @shubhamsrg ( 3^(2p) + 3^(3q) + 3^(5r) )/3 >= 3^( (2p + 3q + 5r)/3 ) HOW???

    • one year ago
  40. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    from AM>=GM

    • one year ago
  41. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh >= got it.

    • one year ago
  42. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Yeah nice one.

    • one year ago
  43. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and continuing that, we have 21s >= 2p + 3q + 5r + 3 but still no idea if that'll help..

    • one year ago
  44. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    And I got: |dw:1349955495301:dw|

    • one year ago
  45. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I guess NOW, we can prove it has no SOLUTION

    • one year ago
  46. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hmm ??

    • one year ago
  47. hartnn Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    *

    • one year ago
  48. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    THAT GIVES: |dw:1349955687180:dw|

    • one year ago
  49. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Now, |dw:1349955794330:dw|

    • one year ago
  50. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Now, can I say No solution...... Or I lack something.

    • one year ago
  51. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    well you have made an assumption that 5r<3q .. only that makes LHS an integer..otherwise you cant say..

    • one year ago
  52. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    am sorry,,you assumed 5r>3q ..

    • one year ago
  53. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    but conclusion to my saying is that you made an assumtion..

    • one year ago
  54. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh...... no assumtion.

    • one year ago
  55. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    L.H.S or R.H.S can be both negative

    • one year ago
  56. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Just looking for integer....... L.H.S will always be integer R.H.S will always be in decimal.

    • one year ago
  57. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    LHS is not necessary an integer.. we only know that p,q,r,s are integers..

    • one year ago
  58. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    and agreed that RHS will always be non-integer..

    • one year ago
  59. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh ya....... got it @shubhamsrg

    • one year ago
  60. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    So,from there we conclude that 5r<3q

    • one year ago
  61. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    guess not,,how can you say that ?

    • one year ago
  62. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Because if 5r>=3q then R.H.S will always be integer.

    • one year ago
  63. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I mean L.H.S

    • one year ago
  64. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    but there is also 5r<=3q possibility ,, the ques doesnt say that 5r - 3q > 0 /// even if that's true..the proof you mention is invalid..

    • one year ago
  65. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    oh wait........ I guess R.H.S can be integer too.

    • one year ago
  66. shubhamsrg Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    also, we may always conclude that 7s > 2p.3q,5r ..but nothing can be said for inequalities in between 2p,3q and 5r..

    • one year ago
  67. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Ok further simplification of it gives: |dw:1349956922192:dw|

    • one year ago
  68. mukushla Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 6

    divide both sides by \(3^{2p}\)\[1+3^{3q-2p}+3^{5r-2p}=3^{7s-2p}\]right hand side is a power of 3 so does the left hand side so we must have\[2p=3q=5r\]\[7s-2p=1\]

    • one year ago
  69. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    GREAT.

    • one year ago
  70. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Now, we need to find its minimum value.

    • one year ago
  71. mukushla Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 6

    what is that fraction?

    • one year ago
  72. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    p+q+r+s = (207p+15)/105

    • one year ago
  73. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    right?

    • one year ago
  74. mukushla Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 6

    ahh yeah :)

    • one year ago
  75. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Now, we need to find its minimum integer value.

    • one year ago
  76. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Oh wait...... But that can make other numbers decimal.

    • one year ago
  77. mukushla Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 6

    u better start with \[7s-2p=1\]ans\[p=\frac{7s-1}{2}\]its immidiate that s is odd let s=2m+1\[p=7m+3\]now find the smallest value of m for which p is a multiple of 3 and 5

    • one year ago
  78. mukushla Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 6

    if u wanna check the answer i found is 106 for \[m=6\]\[p=45\]\[q=30\]\[r=18\]\[s=13\]

    • one year ago
  79. sauravshakya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanx @mukushla u r really amazing.

    • one year ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.