Quantcast

Got Homework?

Connect with other students for help. It's a free community.

  • across
    MIT Grad Student
    Online now
  • laura*
    Helped 1,000 students
    Online now
  • Hero
    College Math Guru
    Online now

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

precal Group Title

Improper Integral

  • 2 years ago
  • 2 years ago

  • This Question is Closed
  1. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350067985984:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  2. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I have the solution, looking for help to understand the process

    • 2 years ago
  3. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    lol .. "Improper Integral" is not quite the term you describe it.

    • 2 years ago
  4. ipm1988 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    break x^4 in (x^2)^2 then use substitution

    • 2 years ago
  5. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350068067914:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  6. ipm1988 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes

    • 2 years ago
  7. ipm1988 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    are you familiar with last three special integrals formula

    • 2 years ago
  8. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    three special integral formula? not sure which one you are referring to

    • 2 years ago
  9. ipm1988 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    did you use double substitution

    • 2 years ago
  10. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    let x^2 = u sub ... this would end up into inverse typerbolic function.

    • 2 years ago
  11. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350068248916:dw|these two?

    • 2 years ago
  12. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    well ... you can try that. but I'll give you a shortcut.

    • 2 years ago
  13. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok I will love to see the shortcut

    • 2 years ago
  14. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    look at the the inverse hyperbolic of sine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_hyperbolic_function

    • 2 years ago
  15. ipm1988 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @experimentX me to please

    • 2 years ago
  16. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    |dw:1350068353134:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  17. ipm1988 Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @experimentX nice one

    • 2 years ago
  18. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I see it is the first one

    • 2 years ago
  19. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    |dw:1350068400466:dw| probably you would get inverse hyperbolic for this types ... but generally formula is given as |dw:1350068503882:dw| ... lol all these forms are inverse hyperbolic function. people usually don't use these.

    • 2 years ago
  20. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350068751083:dw| solution manual has this as a second step

    • 2 years ago
  21. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    hmm ... it really was improper intgral!!

    • 2 years ago
  22. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Is this because of the square root function's domain being continuous on [a, infinity)?

    • 2 years ago
  23. myininaya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    |dw:1350068740846:dw| Start with a right triangle Label the sides such that the inside of that radical you have above appears somewhere. |dw:1350068780160:dw| So we will use substitution \[x^2=\tan( \theta) \] |dw:1350068798338:dw| Now we need to take derivative of both sides of our substitution \[2x dx=\sec^2( \theta) d \theta \]

    • 2 years ago
  24. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    this doesn't converge.

    • 2 years ago
  25. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok I am following you so far

    • 2 years ago
  26. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes in the end, I know this diverges. I know the final answer, just trying to learn the process or understand the process (is a better description)

    • 2 years ago
  27. myininaya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    \[2x dx=\sec^2(\theta) d \theta = > x dx =\frac{1}{2} \sec^2(\theta) d \theta \] Now you go to your little expression and make your "suby's" happen.

    • 2 years ago
  28. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    |dw:1350068915623:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  29. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350069081160:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  30. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I guess I am not sure in the set up why [a, infinity) was used vs (-infinity, b] or (-infinity, infinity) is it because of the domain of the square root function

    • 2 years ago
  31. myininaya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    @precal I'm not sure what you are asking

    • 2 years ago
  32. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    In the definition of Improper integrals over infinite intervals I have 3 definitions

    • 2 years ago
  33. myininaya Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    It is improper integral because of that infinity thing.

    • 2 years ago
  34. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    probably with definition of improper integral ... when you have limit goes to infinity ... you have improper integral of first kind.

    • 2 years ago
  35. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350069479305:dw| provided the limit exists

    • 2 years ago
  36. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    I should mention that if f is continuous on [a,infinity), then for the above first definition

    • 2 years ago
  37. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    2nd definition If f is continuous on (-infinty, b], then|dw:1350069615971:dw| provided the limit exists.

    • 2 years ago
  38. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    |dw:1350069732672:dw| this is called improper integral of First Kind.

    • 2 years ago
  39. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    3rd definition If f is continuous on (-infinity, infinity), then |dw:1350069715530:dw| probided both limits exist, where c is any real number

    • 2 years ago
  40. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    |dw:1350069792525:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  41. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350069861584:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  42. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    as long as you have infinity as limits ... just relax .. they all are of same type of improper integral. probably you are confused with improper integral of second kind.

    • 2 years ago
  43. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350070134924:dw|maybe it is because it should have stated the following limits, I think I see a typo from the source

    • 2 years ago
  44. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    the second kind appears when you have singularity in domain.|dw:1350070237179:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  45. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    |dw:1350070363244:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  46. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    now I see the connection, it has to be establish - no wonder you made the statement earlier about it not being improper

    • 2 years ago
  47. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    |dw:1350070434570:dw|

    • 2 years ago
  48. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok I thinkg I got it, it was the set up that threw me off. I think I understand the solution better now. Thanks

    • 2 years ago
  49. experimentX Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 3

    try watching this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhwQKE_tld0

    • 2 years ago
  50. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    ok thanks, I can use all the help

    • 2 years ago
  51. precal Group Title
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Thanks, I enjoyed that lecture.

    • 2 years ago
    • Attachments:

See more questions >>>

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.