anonymous
  • anonymous
More fun: 0 = 0 =0+0+0+0+0+... =(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+... =1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1+... = 1+ -1 +1 + -1 +1 + -1 +1 +... = 1 + (-1+1) + (-1+1) + (-1+1) +... = 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + ... = 1 + 0 = 1 Therefore 0 = 1, Q.E.D. Where's the problem?
Mathematics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert brainly.com
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
SOLVED
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
chestercat
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at brainly.com in under 10 minutes. Go to brainly.com now for free help!
anonymous
  • anonymous
I don't need help, I just like to post fun things while I wait for other stuff. Can you find the problem in this reasoning? (there has to be a problem, or else all numbers equal each other and cease to have meaning!)
mathslover
  • mathslover
there will be 1 at last?
mathslover
  • mathslover
*-1

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.

More answers

anonymous
  • anonymous
I am not sure that can done or not because we dont know how many how many terms are there in 0+0+0+0+0... Infinity is unreachable.
anonymous
  • anonymous
Sorry for typo
mathslover
  • mathslover
yep u r right !!!
anonymous
  • anonymous
Let there are n terms in 0+0+0+0+... Then Now, let 0=(1-1) Then (1-1)+(1-1)+... 1-1+1-1+1-1... Now this will have 2n terms........ and 2n will be even numbers. Now, 1-1+1-1+-1... =1-(1-1)-(1-1)+... If u will group that like that. and to get 1 there must be odd number of terms But we know it has 2n terms which is even. Thus, it cannot be 1
zugzwang
  • zugzwang
How about \[0 = \sum_{0}^{\infty}0\]is fine \[0=\sum_{0}^{\infty}(1 - 1)\]is fine But \[0 = 1-1+1-1+1-1... = \sum_{0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\] is not fine ...?
anonymous
  • anonymous
\[(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+... \ne1 + (-1+1) + (-1+1) + (-1+1) +..\]Evidently. But why? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandi's_series http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eilenberg%E2%80%93Mazur_swindle
UnkleRhaukus
  • UnkleRhaukus
error is from line four to line five a term is missing =1-1+1-1+1-1+1-1+... = 1+ -1 +1 + -1 +1 + -1 +1 + -1 ...

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.