Quantcast

A community for students. Sign up today!

Here's the question you clicked on:

55 members online
  • 0 replying
  • 0 viewing

zaphod

  • 2 years ago

Help please :)

  • This Question is Closed
  1. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    1 Attachment
  2. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Show that the gain in potential energy of the block is approximately 0.01J?

  3. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @Coolsector

  4. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    @sauravshakya @experimentX

  5. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    |dw:1350213222437:dw| now subtract them and get the answer this difference is due to the increase in hight of second square due to being on its edge

  6. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    why is it 0.16

  7. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it is an approximation due to finding the height of the triangle

  8. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    can u show the calculation?

  9. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    how did u get mgh = 0.15?

  10. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    as m=150/1000 kg g=10 m/s^2 h=10/100 m multiply them and get the ans

  11. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    wt bt the other one 0.16

  12. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    |dw:1350213752879:dw| here h is slightly greater than the previous one thats why the ans will be 0.16 approx.

  13. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    its 14.14 ? the height

  14. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    how did u find the h

  15. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    pythagoras....10^2 + 10^2 = x^2 x = 14.14

  16. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    right, but how will u get the solu.

  17. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    thats what i posted this question..

  18. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    ok

  19. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    how can the height be 11?

  20. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it was an appro

  21. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    from 14?

  22. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    was my method right

  23. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    how did u get 11? i mean frm wt did u approximatre

  24. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    it was just to get the ans dude

  25. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    hmm...do we actually consider the height from the horizontal to cntre of gravity or as a whole?

  26. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    can u give the solu

  27. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i dont knw how to solve it, coz the answer doesnt equal to 0.01 j, maybe theres a problem in the question. anyway thanks for helping

  28. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    were u talking about GPE or only about PE

  29. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    gain in potential energy?

  30. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    i think the H should be taken from the cnt of gravity

  31. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so its 5 cm

  32. Vincent-Lyon.Fr
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Gain in potential energy is m g Δh , where Δh is gain in altitude of the centre of mass of the body.

  33. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    yes :) so i got the answer as 0.03j not 0.01 can u chck where iwent wrong

  34. Vincent-Lyon.Fr
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    Δh = 5√2 - 5 = 2.07 cm = 0.0207 m g = 9.81 m/s² m = 0.150 kg Hence gain = 0.03 J

  35. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    so i am right :)

  36. Vincent-Lyon.Fr
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    You are!

  37. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    i hve a second part in the question, cn i post it here..

  38. rvgupta
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 1

    go ahead

  39. zaphod
    • 2 years ago
    Best Response
    You've already chosen the best response.
    Medals 0

    The collision is perfectly elastic and, without sliding, the block turns about the corner as shown. The block is able to reach the position as shown in the image. 25% of the kinetic energy of the ball is transferred to the block. Calculate 1. the kinetic enrgy of the balll just before it strikes the block

    1 Attachment
  40. Not the answer you are looking for?
    Search for more explanations.

    • Attachments:

Ask your own question

Ask a Question
Find more explanations on OpenStudy

Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.

spraguer (Moderator)
5 → View Detailed Profile

is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...

23

  • Teamwork 19 Teammate
  • Problem Solving 19 Hero
  • You have blocked this person.
  • ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...

Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.

This is the testimonial you wrote.
You haven't written a testimonial for Owlfred.