• anonymous
Which of the following describes why corrective taxes, such as the gasoline tax, are unlike most other taxes? Corrective taxes alter incentives, whereas other taxes typically do not. Corrective taxes bring the allocation of resources closer to the social optimum and, thus, improve economic efficiency. Other taxes are typically used to cover general spending, but funds from corrective taxes can be used only to alleviate pollution. Other taxes get passed on from businesses to consumers, whereas corrective taxes do not.
OCW Scholar - Principles of Microeconomics
  • Stacey Warren - Expert
Hey! We 've verified this expert answer for you, click below to unlock the details :)
At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.
  • chestercat
I got my questions answered at in under 10 minutes. Go to now for free help!
  • anonymous
Corrective taxes (Pigouvian taxes) are related to the concept of externality. Think, for example, the alluminium market. Imagine that this market is in equilibrium, with no government regulation. In this equilibrium point, we have Q* and P*, price and quantities where demand equals supply. If we think only in this particular market, we find that the quantity Q* is optimal. However, we must think about externalities, and how they affect the entire society. We know that the alluminium industry yields pollution. This pollution is a negative externality affecting people that are not even participating in this particular market. So, if we consider the whole society, the original quantity Q* may not be optimal. Maybe, we would like to reduce this Q* to a new quantity Q** where the pollution is lower, and the whole society is in a better position. The pigouvian taxes, in this sense, will force the industry to reduce its production, thus reducing the equilibrium quantity suplied from Q* to Q**. Then we conclude that it will bring the allocation of resources closer to the social optimum and, thus, improve economic efficiency (In terms of social benefits). Maybe a good site to think about:

Looking for something else?

Not the answer you are looking for? Search for more explanations.