A community for students.
Here's the question you clicked on:
 0 viewing
anonymous
 4 years ago
Translate the statement "you cannot watch the movie if you are under 18 years old unless you are accompanied by your parents" into a logical expression
anonymous
 4 years ago
Translate the statement "you cannot watch the movie if you are under 18 years old unless you are accompanied by your parents" into a logical expression

This Question is Closed

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0If u r >=18 or Accompanied by your parents then U can watch movie

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0that's not really a logical expression....

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i assume this will be the start: p: you can watch the movie q: you are under 18 r: you are accompanied by your paretns

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0\(r \wedge q) \rightarrow p\)?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0Well I am not familiar with those symbols

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm seems it should be \[(q \wedge \neg r) \rightarrow \neg p\] why?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmmmmm let me think abt this one

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0that would be splendid

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0if you are under 18 years old and not accompanied by a parent then you can not watch the movie p=under 18 years old q=accompanied by a parent r=unable to watch movie

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0should be (p^~q) > ~r

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0give me one more sec I doubt its (p^q)>r

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0yeah...i just said what it is supposed to be

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0if you are under 18 years old and not accompanied by a parent then you can not watch the movie p=if you are under 18 years old q=accompanied by a parent r= can watch movie

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0....you're just repeating yourself...

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0nope I changed what r symblizes

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0oh. so it's going to be (p ^ ~q) > ~r still i ask..why?

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0which part is confusing? Ok for starters I switched around the order of the sentence. I put the result which was cannot watch movie at the end of the sentence So basically i rearranged the sentence so that the 2 conditions are in the beginning unless accompanied by an adult is another way of saying not accompanied by an adult

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0main part is (p ^ ~q)

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0I am not sure what is confusing you. The hard part is rearranging the sentence

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0i just said what was confusing me....

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0okkk we need 2 conditions in order to not be able to go to the movie 1) under 18 years of age 2) not accompanied by a parent Under 18 years of age is in a postive form p=under 18 years of age Not accompanied by a parent is in a negative form ~q= not accompanied by parent q=accompanied by parent

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0So if you are under 18 years of age and NOT accompanied by a parent Then you can NOT watch the movie (p^~q)=~r ^=and

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0hmm so 18 andnot accompanied by parent implies no watch?

bahrom7893
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1Actually no, under 18 and not accompanied implies no watch.

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0oh...yeah...bad wording

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0under 18 implies bad dreams

bahrom7893
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.1under 18 implies music chatbox

anonymous
 4 years ago
Best ResponseYou've already chosen the best response.0What happens if you frequent music chat when you are older than 18?
Ask your own question
Sign UpFind more explanations on OpenStudy
Your question is ready. Sign up for free to start getting answers.
spraguer
(Moderator)
5
→ View Detailed Profile
is replying to Can someone tell me what button the professor is hitting...
23
 Teamwork 19 Teammate
 Problem Solving 19 Hero
 Engagement 19 Mad Hatter
 You have blocked this person.
 ✔ You're a fan Checking fan status...
Thanks for being so helpful in mathematics. If you are getting quality help, make sure you spread the word about OpenStudy.